检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王凯立[1] WANG Kaili(The Department of Philosophy,Xiamen University,Xiamen Fujian 361005,China)
出 处:《上饶师范学院学报》2024年第4期7-13,29,共8页Journal of Shangrao Normal University
基 金:福建省社科基金青年项目(FJ2022C091);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(20720221038)。
摘 要:我们有什么理由认为对身处困境之人施以救助的行为是道德上“应当”的?对此,全林强博士认为道德心理学所提供的外在主义与内在主义方案均有缺陷,他调动朱子的思想资源提出了一个为援手行为进行道德辩护的“朱子式”方案。然而,这一“朱子式”方案依然不充分,因为在某些特定情况下,它对“援手”行为的道德辩护将会遭遇失败。“朱子式”方案须进一步基于朱子“全”的思想,补充一个对私意私欲的排除机制。这一理论结果表明:在当代哲学视域下,“全”所代表的朱子伦理学的思考方向,还有众多思想资源值得进一步发掘。What reason do we have to justify the idea that providing assistance to people in need is morally right?Dr.Quan Linqiang believes that the solutions provided by both externalism and internalism in moral psychology have flaws,and thus invokes Zhu Xis thoughts to construct a"Zhuzi Style"account to answer the question.However,this"Zhuzi style"account is still insufficient,because its justification of supportive behaviour fails in some specific cases.In this regard,based on Zhu Xis thoughts of"quan"(全),"Zhuzi style"account needs to be supplemented with an exclusion mechanism for private thoughts and desires.This work reveals that in the contemporary philosophical perspective,there are still many thinking resources worth further exploration in the thinking direction of Zhu Xis ethics representedby"quan"(全).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90