自洗钱入刑后若干法律问题之应对  

Response to Several Legal Issues since Criminalization of Self-money Laundering

作　　者：马春娟[1] 李睿 Ma Chunjuan;Li Rui(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,He′nan,China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《梧州学院学报》2024年第5期1-11,共11页Journal of Wuzhou University

摘　　要：自洗钱犯罪入刑后,我国刑法对自洗钱犯罪行为的定性及刑罚方法发生了质的变化,继而给洗钱罪的法律适用带来了新的挑战。首先,自洗钱行为犯罪已突破事后不可罚理论的壁垒,具备独立的法益侵害性。对于自洗钱犯罪的认定应当综合其构成要件、行为方式等因素进行分析,以厘清自洗钱与他洗钱的界限。其次,当自洗钱与上游犯罪竞合时,应从立法和司法的角度实行数罪并罚;当其与传统赃物罪竞合时,在司法层面,应当把握行为人的掩饰、隐瞒方式、主观动机、侵犯的法益和相关法律规定等因素,综合判断是否构成法规竞合。Since the criminalization of money laundering,there has been a qualitative change in the identification and punishment methods of self-laundering in China′s criminal law,which has brought new challenges to the legal application of money laundering.First,self-money laundering crime has broken through the barriers of post-event unpunishable theory,and has independent legal infringement.The identification of the self-money laundering crime should be analyzed by combining its constitutive elements,behavior mode and other factors,so as to clarify the boundary between self-money laundering and money laundering.Second,when the concurrence of self-laundering and predicate crimes exists,there should be combined punishment for several crimes from both legislative and judicial perspectives;when the concurrence of self-laundering and crime of stolen property exists,at the judicial level,it is necessary to take into account factors such as the perpetrator′s concealment,concealment methods,subjective motives,infringed legal interests,and relevant legal provisions,then comprehensively judge whether it constitutes legal provision concurrence.

关 键 词：洗钱罪 自洗钱 法益侵害性 竞合 数罪并罚 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]