洪涝灾害研究主题的时空差异性:中英文文献比较研究  

Comparative review of flood disaster research themes:spatiotemporal differences in Chinese and English language literature

作　　者：贺蔚杰 田健[1] 宋苑震 张家豪 曾坚[1] HE Weijie;TIAN Jian;SONG Yuanzhen;ZHANG Jiahao;ZENG Jian(School of Architecture,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China)

机构地区：[1]天津大学建筑学院,天津300072

出　　处：《安全与环境学报》2024年第11期4391-4400,共10页Journal of Safety and Environment

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(52378065)。

摘　　要：在全球气候变化背景下,洪涝灾害已成为威胁人群生命财产安全的世界性问题。目前,关于洪涝灾害的研究已较为丰富,需进行系统性梳理和总结。为探究国内外洪涝灾害的研究现状与趋势,采用文献计量的分析方法,对2003—2022年中国知网(China National Knowledge Infrastructure,CNKI)和WoS(Web of Science)数据库中主题为洪涝灾害的中英文文献进行文本分析。从关键词共现模式、研究主题的时间聚类及空间分布三个角度,探索洪涝灾害相关研究的主题演进模式和地理分布特征,并总结未来发展方向。结果表明:(1)在研究关键词共现模式方面,中文研究更加关心洪涝灾害区域影响及管理策略等灾害的后续影响方面,英文研究则更倾向于探究洪涝灾害的成因,从气候变化与孕灾环境角度分析洪涝灾害。中英文研究均强调新兴技术在洪涝灾害研究中的应用。(2)在研究主题时间聚类方面,中文研究在21世纪初期追随英文研究的关注热点,并在2015年前后逐渐形成具有中国本土化特色的研究框架,强调使用多源数据和多种算法模型进行定量化分析,主要着眼于城市化发展对洪涝灾害的多时段、多尺度干预效应。(3)在研究主题空间分布方面,沿海经济发达地区受到研究者更多的关注,表明洪涝灾害研究的主题与数量受到研究区域的地理位置、气候条件和社会经济发展水平的影响。This study investigates the current state and trends of flood disaster literature in Chinese and English languages from 2003 to 2022,utilizing bibliometric analysis of China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)and Web of Science(WoS)databases.A research theme analysis path is constructed,employing co-occurrence networks,theme clustering,and geographic parsing to analyze 2192 Chinese papers and 10305 English papers collected.After employing innovative text analysis and natural language processing techniques to extract research keywords and regional features,this study unveils the evolutionary patterns and geographical distribution characteristics of flood disaster-related research.It does so through three perspectives:analyzing keyword co-occurrence patterns,temporal clustering of research themes,and spatial distribution.The future direction of related research is also explored in this study.The results reveal that:(1)Keyword Co-occurrence Patterns:Chinese research focuses more on the regional impact of flood disasters and management strategies.In contrast,English research tends to delve into the causes of flood disasters,primarily analyzing them through the lenses of climate change and disaster-prone environments.In addition,both Chinese and English research emphasize the application of emerging technologies in flood disaster research.(2)In terms of temporal clustering of research themes,Chinese research initially mirrored the hotspots of English research in the early 21st century.Subsequently,around 2015,it began to develop a research framework with distinctive Chinese characteristics.This framework emphasizes the utilization of multi-source data and diverse algorithmic models for quantitative analysis.Specifically,it focuses on understanding the multi-period,multi-scale impacts of urbanization development on flood disasters.(3)In terms of the spatial distribution of research themes,coastal economically developed areas often garner more attention from researchers.The themes and quantity of flood disaster rese

关 键 词：公共安全 洪涝灾害 文本分析 共现网络 潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA)模型 地理解析 对比分析 

分 类 号：X43[环境科学与工程—灾害防治]