论程颢、程颐《论语》诠释的工夫论倾向  

On the Tendency of Gongfu Theory in the Interpretation of the Analects by Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi

作　　者：宁丽娟 李春强 NING Lijuan;LI Chunqiang

机构地区：[1]景德镇陶瓷大学设计艺术学院 [2]淮阴工学院人文学院

出　　处：《中国矿业大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第6期113-125,共13页Journal of China University of Mining & Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“宋明理学视域下的《论语》诠释研究”(项目编号:19FZXB080)。

摘　　要：二程讲求于切身体认中进德成圣而达于超越之境,其《论语》诠释过程始终贯彻克己、诚己、尽己、推己的工夫论倾向。第一,程颢将“克己复礼”视为保障“道”之本体呈现于“己”之工夫践履,程颐将“礼”置于“天理”与“人欲”的二元架构中,摄“礼”归“理”。第二,程颢以“诚”作为贯彻智仁勇三达德的衡量标准,将“自得”发挥“自然见”得与“自能寻”得,程颐则走向“敬”而循“理”,乃至“自诚”“不思而得”,并看重不假外求之“素诚”“素敬”之工夫境界。第三,二程共同明确“忠”与“恕”的体用关系,但程颐明显侧重于推己工夫阐发。二程于《论语》诠释中持有的工夫论呈现出程序的共通性与指向的趋同性,为四书学的形成准备了条件。Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi emphasizes the realization of virtue and sanctification in the process of interpretation of the Analects,and has always implemented the tendency of self-denial,self-sincerity,and self-dedication.First,Cheng Hao regarded"self denial and return to propriety"as the noumenon of"Tao"and presented it in his practice;Cheng Yi put"ritual"in the binary structure of"natural reason"and"human desire",and took"ritual"to"reason".Second,Cheng Hao took"sincerity"as the standard to measure the implementation of wisdom,benevolence,courage and virtue,and gave full play to"self satisfaction"by"natural insight"and"self discovery";Cheng Yi went to"respect"and followed"reason",and even"self sincerity"and"get without thinking",and paid attention to the realm of"pure sincerity"and"pure respect".Third,Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi jointly clarified the relationship between"loyalty"and"forgiveness",but Cheng Yi obviously focused on explaining his own efforts.The Gongfu theory held by Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi in the interpretation of the Analects of Confucius shows the commonality of procedures and the convergence of directions,which has prepared the conditions for the formation of the study of"The Four Books".

关 键 词：工夫论 《论语》 二程 

分 类 号：B222.1[哲学宗教—中国哲学] B244.6