刑事诉讼法再修改与电子数据证据制度的完善——以跨境电信网络诈骗犯罪为切入点  

Further revisions to the Criminal Procedure Law and the improvement of electronic evidence system:focusing on Cross-border Telecommunication Fraud Crimes

作　　者：翁音韵 曹瑞璇 Weng Yinyun;Cao Ruixuan(Shanghai People's Procuratorate,Shanghai 200020,The People's Procuratorate of Shanghai Fengxian District,Shanghai 201499;不详)

机构地区：[1]上海市人民检察院,上海200020 [2]上海市奉贤区人民检察院,上海201499

出　　处：《证据科学》2024年第5期545-558,共14页Evidence Science

基　　金：2023年最高人民检察院检察案件管理理论研究课题“案件质量管理制度机制研究”;2024年上海市检察机关重点研究课题“高质效办好每一个案件的实现路径与制度保障”阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：因应数字全球化的革命性发展,我国刑事诉讼法迎来第四次修改。从解释论视角看,我国现行电子数据规范体系存在制度供给不足、法律衔接不畅、与国际公约不适配等内生性缺陷。在办理跨境电信网络诈骗案件过程中,电子数据的取证、证明与审查认定均面临结构性挑战。为充分发挥电子数据在打击跨境电信网络诈骗犯罪中的作用,应当构建高效合法的跨境电子数据取证机制,完善电子数据相关证明方法,优化电子数据的审查与认定规则。立法与司法部门通过立法完善与制度创新,对我国电子数据证据制度的完善进行保障。In response to the revolutionary development brought about by digital globalization,China's Criminal Procedure Law is undergoing its fourth amendment.From the perspective of interpretive theory,the existing regulatory framework for electronic data maintains intrinsic deficiencies,including inadequate regulations,poor cohesion,and incompatibility with international conventions.In cross-border telecommunications fraud cases,the collection,authentication,and assessment of electronic data are suffering structural challenges.To fully leverage the role of electronic data in combating cross-border telecommunication fraud,it is essential to establish an efficient and legitimate cross-border e-evidence collection mechanism,refine the method of electronic data’s authentication,and optimize the rules of data assessment and validation.Legislative and judicial departments should ensure the enhancement of China's electronic data evidence system by improving legal system and promoting institutional innovation.

关 键 词：跨境电信网络诈骗犯罪 刑事诉讼法 电子数据 证据体系 立法 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]