检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王倩[1] Wang Qian
机构地区:[1]西北工业大学,陕西西安710129
出 处:《中国ESP研究》2024年第3期93-105,177,共14页Chinese Journal of ESP
基 金:2021年度陕西省哲学社会科学基金“框架语义学视域下国际期刊论文中knowledge emotions研究”(项目编号:2021K021)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:国际期刊学术论文中含有情感色彩,表达对科学命题内容评价的“兴趣”标记是作者与读者进行学术对话、交流和传播新知识的重要语言资源。本研究基于框架语义学理论,借助“兴趣”标记认知语义分析框架考察了“兴趣”标记历时30年(1989—1993 vs.2019—2023)在应用语言学国际期刊论文中使用的变化。研究结果表明:与早期相比,作者在近期学术发表中更倾向于使用“兴趣”标记表达情感立场,积极评价已有/当前研究发现的“有趣性”,并解释这种情感评价的原因。此外,作者在近期学术发表中更倾向于使用强化型兴趣标记,选择“现身”文本,明示自己为“兴趣”情绪的体验者。这些话语实践变化不仅反映了当今“发表还是出局”这种竞争加剧的学术文化,还折射了以学科知识专业化和读者群体扩大化、分散化为特征的学术语境的动态演变。Interest markers indexing academic authors’affective attitudes toward propositional content are important linguistic resources to achieve writer-reader interaction and communicate scientific knowledge in research articles.Drawing on a frame-semantic perspective,this study has investigated diachronic changes regarding the use of interest markers in applied linguistic research articles published in two time periods separated by 30 years(1989-1993 vs 2019-2023).The results revealed that academic authors were more likely to deploy interest markers for stance-taking,evaluate the interestingness of the current/previous research,and explain why the emotion of interest was elicited,than those from the earlier period were.In addition,they were prone to deploy boosted interest,intrude into the text and identify themselves as the experiencers of the expressed interest in the more recent period.These changing discursive practices reflect the competitive academia characterized by a publish or perish dictum and the dynamically evolved academic context featured by the specialized discipline,the expanding and heterogeneous readership in scholarly communication.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7