检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郝治翰 刘震[1] 陈阳 王蒲生 HAO Zhi-han;LIU Zhen;CHEN Yang;WANG Pu-sheng(School of Marxism,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China;Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School,Shenzhen 518055,China)
机构地区:[1]清华大学马克思主义学院,北京100084 [2]清华大学深圳国际研究生院,广东深圳518055
出 处:《科学学研究》2024年第11期2355-2364,共10页Studies in Science of Science
基 金:深圳市人文社会科学重点研究基地资助成果;深圳市高等院校稳定支持计划面上项目(WDZC20231127152239002)。
摘 要:结构洞理论对社会网络研究贡献甚大,将社会网络分析的关注点从网络构型和连结强度转移到节点位置。根据该理论,社会资本根源于潜藏在网络断片之间的经纪机会,恰当地利用这种机会则会带来至少两种优势:第一,经纪权力,基于对网络断片之间交流通路的垄断控制,行动者可坐收渔利,以经纪人的身份安排其所沟连社群间的关系、控制其间资源流动,获取有利的套利比率。第二,知识整合,行动者在异质社群间担任连结纽带,得以接触并熟谙迥异的思维方式与默会知识,卓有效率地搜集新颖信息,进而率先发现创新机会,促进创新涌现。两种优势指向全然不同的社会机制,大多既往研究却未加甄别、混为一谈。本研究收集Science期刊2000-2018年刊载论文数据构建网络模型,运用回归分析方法,检验结构洞社会资本在科研场域的适用性,并比较结构洞两种优势的差异。结果表明:在科研合作网络中占据结构洞位置对收获同行承认有促进作用;知识整合的作用强度高于经纪权力。Structural holes theory has great contributions to the research on social networks,which shifts the focus from network configuration and connection strength to the node location.According to this theory,social capital is rooted in the potential for brokering opportunities hidden among network fragments,and appropriate use of such opportunities can bring at least two advantages:First,brokerage power.By controlling the path through network segmentations,brokers as tertius gaudens can arrange the communication of the segmentations,control the flows of resources,and obtain the opportunities of arbitrage;Second,knowledge integration.Serving as a link between heterogeneous groups,actors access to and familiarize different ways of thinking and diverse tacit knowledge,effectively collecting novel information,and thereby taking the lead in discovering innovative opportunities and promoting innovation.However,most of the previous studies confused and undistinguished these two advantages that are rooted in completely different social mechanisms.We collect the information of publication in Science from 2000 to 2018 to build the network model,test the hypotheses of structural holes theory in the scientific research field by regression analysis,and compare these two advantages of the structural holes in the scientific co-authorship network.The results show:Occupation of structural holes promotes peer recognition;The role of the knowledge integration surpass that of the brokerage power.The theoretical significance of this study are as follows:First,this research clearly define and summarize the advantages of structural holes as two different mechanisms:brokerage power and knowledge integration,which is ambiguous in the existing literature.Although these two mechanisms have certain connections and sometimes may play a role together in individual cases,they are distinct social mechanisms,and thus clearly distinguishing them is of importance.Second,this research uses different measures to separately quantify the brokerage power an
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7