类型化思维视野下赌博犯罪适用难点及解决路径研究  

Research On The Law Suitability Puzzles Of Gambling And Its Solutions From The Perspective Of Typological Ideology

作　　者：上海市浦东新区人民检察院课题组 陈苹 杜宇[2] Research Group of People's Procuratorate of Pudong New Area(People's Procuratorate of Pudong New Area,Shanghai 200135,China)

机构地区：[1]上海市浦东新区人民检察院,上海200135 [2]复旦大学法学院

出　　处：《上海公安学院学报》2024年第5期49-56,共8页Journal of Shanghai Police College

基　　金：2024年最高人民检察院检察应用理论研究课题“赌博犯罪法律适用问题研究——以类型化思维浅析赌博类犯罪法律适用难点及解决路径”阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在传统概念化思维的影响下,赌博类犯罪的办理存在罪名界限模糊、量刑不均等法律适用争议,类型化梳理赌博类犯罪适用问题,可以缓解刑法规范与司法实践的断层,保障刑法安定性和妥当性,更好地发挥出法律的应有之义。对于案例分析、数据比对所反映的对组织、参与赌博活动的行为定性、量刑适用等司法困境,应理顺法律内部逻辑,以类型化思维展开对赌博类案件司法适用路径探索。With the influence of traditional conceptual ideology,there exist law application suitability disputes such as unclear definitions of accusation and unequal sentencing in the disposal of gambling.To deal with the law application suitability issue of gambling in the way of typological ideology can shorten the distance between criminal law norms and judicial practice,improve the stability and appropriateness of the criminal law,and better fulfill the due meaning of the law.When confronting the judicial puzzles reflected in case analysis and data matching,the law application appropriateness of sentencing gambling activities such as organization or participation,judicial officers should clarify the legal intrinsic logic and explore the methodology of law application appropriateness for gambling cases in the way of typological ideology.

关 键 词：赌博犯罪 类型化 概念化 法律适用 

分 类 号：D631[政治法律—政治学]