詹安泰先生的温庭筠词批评论略  

A Brief Discussion on Zhan Antai’s Criticism of Wen Tingyun’s Ci Poems

作　　者：王奎光 WANG Kui-guang(College of Literature and Journalism,Hanshan Normal University,Chaozhou,Guangdong,521041)

机构地区：[1]韩山师范学院文学与新闻传播学院,广东潮州521041

出　　处：《韩山师范学院学报》2024年第5期28-34,共7页Journal of Hanshan Normal University

基　　金：韩山师范学院文科重点项目(项目编号:WZ201402)。

摘　　要：清代常州词派与民国词学新派对温庭筠词的评价可谓截然相反,而詹安泰先生前后期的温词批评则表明,他对这两派的观点既有肯定,也有批评。对常州词派,他虽然肯定其以寄托论词,但又对他们不懂知人论世而盲目抬高温庭筠词的做法予以批评;对词学新派,他赞同他们对温词没有寄托的认定,但又针砭其近乎全面否定温词文学高度的论调。詹先生的温词批评,典型地体现了其实事求是、严谨治学的学术精神,值得学习。The evaluation of Wen Tingyun’s ci poems by the Changzhou School of Ci Poetry in the Qing Dynasty and the New School of Ci Poetry in the Republic of China can be described as completely opposite,and Zhan Antai’s criticism of Wen’s poetry in the early and late periods indicates that he both affirmed and criticized the views of the two schools.Regarding the Changzhou School of Ci Poetry,although he affirmed their use of sentiments to discuss ci poetry,he also criticized their blind promotion of Wen Tingyun’s ci poems due to their lack of understanding of people and the world.Regarding the New School of Ci Poetry,he agreed with their identification that there were no sentiments in Wen’s ci poems,but also criticized their almost complete negation of the literary height of Wen’s ci poems.Zhan’s criticism of Wen’s ci poems embodies his pragmatic and rigorous academic spirit,which is worth learning from.

关 键 词：温庭筠 常州词派 词学新派 寄托 艺术性 

分 类 号：I207.23[文学—中国文学]