检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡宏兵[1] 张迪 王彤宇 万晨声 Hu Hongbing;Zhang Di;Wang Tongyu;Wan Chensheng
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学金融学院 [2]华中师范大学教育学院
出 处:《财政研究》2024年第7期113-128,F0003,共17页Public Finance Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金2022年度一般项目“保险发展促进共同富裕的指标体系、路径机理与政策建议研究”(22BJY217)的资助。
摘 要:教育在促进全体人民共同富裕的历史进程中具有基础性、战略性作用。本文基于2011—2021年CHFS数据构建共同富裕指数,探讨教育发展对共同富裕的影响效应和作用机制。研究发现:第一,教育发展能够显著提升家庭共同富裕水平,该结果在经过一系列的稳健性检验和内生性处理之后依然成立。第二,教育发展影响共同富裕的效应存在差异,在低负债水平、强社会网络、高父辈受教育程度和高共同富裕水平的家庭中表现更为突出。第三,机制分析表明,教育发展通过发挥创富效应、均富效应和守富效应来促进共同富裕实现。基于上述结论,本文为制定推动教育高质量发展以促进共同富裕的相关政策建议提供了参考依据。Education plays a foundational and strategic role in driving the historical process of realizing the Chinese-style modernization vision and promoting common prosperity for all people.This study constructs a Common Prosperity Index based on the 2011—2021 China Household Finance Survey(CHFS)data to explore the impact and mechanism of educational development on common prosperity.The research findings are as follows:First,educational development significantly promotes the improvement of family common prosperity levels,a result that holds true even after a series of robustness checks and endogeneity adjustments.Second,the effect of educational development on common prosperity varies,with more pronounced effects observed in households with low debt levels,strong social networks,high parental education levels,and high levels of common prosperity.Third,the mechanism analysis indicates that educational development facilitates common prosperity through wealth creation effects,equity-enhancing effects,and wealth preservation effects.Based on these conclusions,this study provides theoretical reference for formulating relevant policy recommendations to promote high-quality education development and foster common prosperity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.232.138