学术汉语语体语言特征多维度测量研究--与新闻类、通用类、小说类语体对比视角  

A Multidimensional Measurement Study of the Linguistic Features of Academic Chinese Writing--A Comparative Perspective with News,General,and Fictional Writing Genres

作　　者：吴继峰[1] 胡韧奋 彭一平 WU Jifeng;HU Renfen;PENG Yiping

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学,北京100089 [2]北京师范大学,北京100875 [3]北京理工大学,北京100081

出　　处：《语言文字应用》2024年第3期30-43,共14页Applied Linguistics

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“留学生汉语学术话语能力评估与提升路径研究”(23BYY134)资助。

摘　　要：本文基于兰卡斯特现代汉语语料库,采用对比视角,通过54项词汇、句法、语义和语篇衔接测量指标,考察了学术类写作与新闻类、通用类、小说类写作的语言特征差异。研究发现,在46项指标上,学术类汉语写作与其他三种语体写作均存在显著差异。学术汉语词汇和句法的使用更加正式、复杂、保守,语义和可读性难度更大,语篇衔接上更重视词汇衔接手段、语法中的显性连词以及话题中的名词主语,在四种书面语体中最正式。另外,本文还从语体视角对造成差异的原因进行了探讨。This study,based on the Lancaster Modern Chinese Corpus,employs a comparative approach to investigate the linguistic disparities between academic writing and news,general,and fiction writing through 54 indices assessing vocabulary,syntax,semantics,and discourse cohesion.The findings reveal that academic Chinese writing exhibits significant differences from the other three genres of writing in 46 indices.The utilization of vocabulary and syntax in academic Chinese is more formal,complex,and conservative,with higher semantic and readability complexity.In terms of discourse cohesion,academic Chinese writing places greater emphasis on lexical cohesion devices,explicit conjunctions in grammar,and nominal.

关 键 词：学术汉语 语体 语言特征 测量 

分 类 号：H195[语言文字—汉语]