检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:公子晨 GONG Zichen(Southeast University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 211189,China)
机构地区:[1]东南大学,江苏南京211189
出 处:《医学与法学》2024年第6期102-109,共8页Medicine and Jurisprudence
摘 要:我国安宁疗护的现行规定多为组织管理性的或技术层面的操作要求,而对实体权利的规范相对缺乏,对此,学界提出“生命权说”“病人自主权说”“健康权说”以明确安宁疗护的权利基础,但均存在缺陷,因为单一权利无法回应安宁疗护的丰富内涵。为解决这些缺陷,当引入“权利束”分析框架,而无须创设新型权利并分析其构造。“权利束”基于同一价值目标,从动态视角分析多组权利,具有灵活性和系统性,可将末期病人生命尊严作为有效“束点”,整合多主体多项权利,合理划定各权利边界,建构安宁疗护的权利基础。The current regulations of palliative care in China are mostly organizational management or technical requirements,and the norms of substantive rights are relatively lacking.Therefore,the academic community has put forward the"right to life","pa⁃tient autonomy"and"right to health"to clarify the right basis of palliative care,but they all have defects,because a single right cannot respond to its rich connotation.In this regard,we should introduce the"rights bundle"analysis framework to solve the existing defects,without creating new rights and analyzing its structure.Based on the same value goal,the"rights bundle"analyzes multiple groups of rights from a dynamic perspective,it is flexible and systematic,and can take the life dignity of terminally ill patients as an effective"bundle point",integrate multiple rights of multiple subjects,reasonably demarcate the boundaries of rights,and construct the right basis of palliative care.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49