医疗美容纠纷中请求权竞合的诉讼路径研究  

Research on the Iitigation of the Concurrence of Claims in Medical Cosmetology Disputes

作　　者：张娜[1] 李抒波 ZHANG Na;LIShubo(Shanxi University,Taiyuan,Shanxi 030006,China)

机构地区：[1]山西大学,山西太原030006

出　　处：《医学与法学》2024年第4期112-119,共8页Medicine and Jurisprudence

基　　金：2023年度山西省研究生科研创新项目“民法典与民事诉讼法协同实施下请求权竞合研究”(项目编号:2023KY059)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：医疗美容纠纷中存在请求权竞合的现象,其他国家或地区在请求权竞合下的诉讼有“客观预备合并之诉”“客观选择合并之诉”和“客观重叠合并之诉”三种形态;结合我国《民法典》中对于请求权竞合时“择一行使”的解决思路,以及我国医疗美容行业法治建设尚待完善、律师代理匮乏、诉讼资源有限等现实因素,我国应选择“客观预备合并之诉”作为解决医疗美容纠纷的主要诉讼实施路径。There exists the phenomenon of the competition and concurrence of claims in medical cosmetology disputes,and in other countries or regions,there are three forms:"objective preparatory joinder","objective selective joinder"and"objective overlapping join-der".Combining with the"alternative exercise"in The Civil Code in China,and the practical factors such as the improving construction of the rule of law in China's medical cosmetology industry,the lack of lawyer agents,and the limited litigation resources,we should choose"objective preparatory joinder"as the main litigation means to solve medical cosmetology disputes.

关 键 词：医疗美容纠纷 请求权竞合 客观预备合并之诉 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学] R-05[政治法律—法学]