《难经》学术研究方法述评  

Comment of academic research methods on Nanjing

作　　者：孙文奇 翟双庆 禄颖 杜林珊 陈子杰 SUN Wenqi;ZHAI Shuangqing;LU Ying;DU Linshan;CHEN Zijie(School of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,China)

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学中医学院,北京100029

出　　处：《中华中医药杂志》2024年第11期5685-5691,共7页China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy

基　　金：科技部科技基础资源调查专项(No.2022FY102000,No.2022FY102002);国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(No.2013CB532001)

摘　　要：《难经》作为成书时间较早的中医经典,在中医理论体系形成发展中具有重要地位,历代医家借助多种方法进行系统研究并加以注释,取得重要成果。文章在系统梳理了30余部《难经》注本的基础上,将历代注家研究《难经》的方法归纳为主题分篇研究法、随文演绎研究法、注家汇参研究法三大类,其作用分别为提炼整体框架、阐释原文内涵、甄选代表性注文,并在每类研究方法下,根据其特点进行细分,以供《难经》学术研究参考。As an earlier-written classic of traditional Chinese medicine,Nanjing occupies a crucial position in the establishment and development of the theoretical system of traditional Chinese medicine.Doctors of all dynasties have systematically investigated and annotated it through various means and achieved remarkable outcomes.Based on the systematic arrangement of over 30 annotated editions of Nanjing,this paper categorizes the approaches used by annotators of past dynasties to study Nanjing into three types:thematic essay research approach,essay deduction research approach,and annotators compile references research approach.Their functions are respectively to extract the overall framework,explain the connotation of the original text,and select representative annotated texts.Further subdivisions are made according to their characteristics under each research approach to provide references for the academic research of Nanjing.

关 键 词：《难经》 研究方法 学术 中医文献 

分 类 号：R221.9[医药卫生—中医基础理论]