《黄帝内经》经典化考论  

Scholarly research of the canonization of Huangdi Neijing

作　　者：樊经洋 翟双庆[1] FAN Jingyang;ZHAI Shuangqing(Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,China)

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学,北京100029

出　　处：《中华中医药杂志》2024年第11期5692-5698,共7页China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy

基　　金：科技部科技基础资源调查专项(No.2022FY102000,No.2022FY102002)

摘　　要：经典化问题是中医思想史研究的重要课题。文章拟以《黄帝内经》经典化进程中最具争议的学术史个案——“运气七篇的补入”为核心问题,在充分考虑其文献学定位与学术史影响之间深刻张力的前提下,将思想文本自身脉络演进的“内因”维度与宋代官方学术趣向的“外因”维度相结合,论证运气七篇纳入经典文本系统的合法性根据,探讨其在《黄帝内经》经典化进程中的意义与价值,并借此反思中国传统医学语境下“经典性”的思想内核与意涵指向。The issue of canonization is a significant topic in the study of the history of traditional Chinese medicine thought.This paper intends to focus on one of the most controversial academic cases in the canonization process of Huangdi Neijing:the supplement of the Seven Articles of Yun-qi.By thoroughly considering the profound tension between its philological positioning and its historical academic impact,this study integrates the‘internal cause’dimension of the evolution of the ideological text itself with the‘external cause’dimension of the academic tendencies of the Song dynasty.It argues the legitimacy of including the Seven Articles of Yun-qi into the canonical text system,explores its significance and value in the canonization process of Huangdi Neijing,and thereby reflects on the ideological core and implications of‘canonical’in the context of traditional Chinese medicine.

关 键 词：《黄帝内经》 经典化 运气七篇 

分 类 号：R221[医药卫生—中医基础理论]