检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴彬 高凌云 都仁 孙莉 WU Bin;GAO Lingyun;DU Ren;SUN Li
机构地区:[1]北京教育科学研究院高等教育科学研究所,北京100036 [2]北京航空航天大学人文社会科学学院(公共管理学院)
出 处:《煤炭高等教育》2024年第3期77-84,共8页Meitan Higher Education
摘 要:一流理工科大学也要建设一流的文科。成功建成本国一流文科的麻省理工学院和清华大学都具有典型意义,但两所大学走的道路并不同。麻省理工学院遵循培养精英的理念,文科建设采取跨学科主导的范式变革模式;清华大学坚持服务战略的理念,采取规划引导的资源驱动模式。这两种模式的成功与两所大学所身处的时代和环境具有密切联系,难以直接模仿。但是,变革组织带动学科交叉、特色布局引领局部突破、动态竞争吸引资源聚集等举措,有助于推动一流文科建设。First-class science and engineering universities should also build the first-class liberal arts.The success of MIT and Tsinghua University in building the country's leading liberal arts uni-versities is typical,but the two universities have taken different paths.MIT follows the idea of culti-vating elites,and the construction of liberal arts adopts the paradigm change model led by interdisci-plinary;Tsinghua University adheres to the concept of service strategy and adopts a resource-driv-en model guided by planning.The success of these two models is closely related to the era and envi-ronment of the two universities,and it is difficult to imitate them directly.However,measures such as the transformation organization driving interdisciplinary,characteristic layout leading local break-throughs,and dynamic competition attracting resource aggregation are conducive to promoting the construction of first-class liberal arts.
分 类 号:G640[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15