检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢素珺[1] XIE Su-jun
机构地区:[1]广东司法警官职业学院法律系
出 处:《河北法律职业教育》2024年第11期84-89,共6页HEBEI VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OF LAW
摘 要:目前,我国已有不少学者对行政争议诉前调解进行了探讨,但无论是从理论上还是从机制上,当下的调解都存在着一定的缺陷。从功能上看,它是行政诉讼繁简分离制度的一个组成部分,是全国范围内的一种非诉讼纠纷解决机制,是实现司法权和行政权之间的平衡,也是实现行政争议实质性化解的一种有效手段。就调解机制的构思而言,应从调解的主体、纠纷的适用范围和启动方式三个方面入手;在具体的实施过程中,还应考虑到诉前调解与司法确认、诉讼程序的衔接等问题,以期达到诉源治理与实质解决纠纷的目的。Currently,numerous scholars in China have discussed pre-litigation mediation in administrative disputes,yet there exist certain deficiencies in current mediation practices,both theoretically and mechanistically.Functionally,it serves as a component of the system for separating complex and simple administrative litigation cases,a nationwide alternative dispute resolution mechanism,a means of balancing judicial and administrative powers,and an effective tool for achieving substantive resolution of administrative disputes.In terms of practical application and conceptualization of the mediation mechanism,it should be approached from three perspectives:the mediators,the scope of applicable disputes,and the initiation methods.During the specific implementation process,considerations should also be given to issues such as the integration of pre-litigation mediation with judicial confirmation and litigation procedures,aiming to achieve the goals of dispute source management and substantive dispute resolution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.25