检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张黎莉 严荣[2] ZHANG Lili;YAN Rong
机构地区:[1]上海市房地产科学研究院住房保障和发展所 [2]上海市房地产科学研究院
出 处:《上海城市规划》2024年第5期1-6,共6页Shanghai Urban Planning Review
摘 要:在保障性住房政策的发展历程中,美国模式、欧洲福利国家模式、混合型模式、东南亚福利国家模式颇具代表性。通过比较研究,认为4种模式在发展演进,以及构建的背景条件、配套政策措施、实际实施效果等方面均存在较大差异,结合我国保障性住房发展中存在的问题,得到以下启示:建立健全相应的法律法规是保障性住房政策实施的重要保障;构建多层次、多元化保障政策体系是保障性住房政策设计的重要思路;强调社会力量参与是实现保障性住房政策可持续发展的重要抓手;加强金融创新和风险防范是保障性住房政策设计的着力点;注重保障性住房政策与其他相关的经济社会政策目标相结合是放大保障性住房政策效应的重要途径。The American model,the European welfare state model,the mixed model,and the Southeast Asian welfare state model are the four major international affordable housing policy models.Through comparative research,it is believed that there are significant differences among the four models in terms of evolution,background conditions,policy measures,implementation effects,advantages and disadvantages.The following enlightenments are drawn.Establishing and improving the corresponding laws and regulations is an important guarantee for the implementation of affordable housing policies.The formation of multi-level and diversified security is an important idea of affordable housing policies.Emphasizing the participation of social forces is an important measure for achieving sustainable development of affordable housing.Strengthening financial innovation and risk prevention is the focus of designing affordable housing policies.Paying attention to the combination of affordable housing policies and other related economic and social policies is an important way to enlarge the effect of affordable housing policies.
分 类 号:TU981[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222