康德判断的量与量的范畴对应关系——一个发生学的破解  

Kant’s Correspondence Between the Quantity of Judgments and the Categories of Quantity-A Genetic Explain

作　　者：钱捷 何珊珊 Qian Jie;He Shanshan

机构地区：[1]中山大学哲学系(珠海),广东珠海519082

出　　处：《学术研究》2024年第11期29-35,177,共8页Academic Research

摘　　要：康德著作诠释史上存在一个“悬案”:为什么在康德的不同文本中,判断表中量的契机与范畴表中量的范畴之间存在着两种不同的对应关系?与多数对此问题发表过看法的诠释者不同,我们并不预设康德从一开始就对这种对应关系有着既定的观点。因为决定这个对应关系的乃是超绝逻辑的核心课题,即范畴如何使得认识的对象成为可能。康德在不同文本中给出了不同的对应关系这个事实,很可能恰恰表明他关于这一课题的思想有一个逐渐明确的过程。我们一方面基于对康德的相关思路的考察,揭示了康德相关文本变化的原因,另一方面也指出,康德相关文本的年代学与这一变化是吻合的。于是,对于上述悬案,我们给出了一个发生学的破解。This article attempts to uncover one of the“unsolved cases”in the interpretation history of Kant’s works:why there are two different ways of writing about the correspondence between the moments of quantity in the table of judgments and the categories of the quantity in the table of categories in Kant’s different texts.Unlike the majority of commentators,we do not assume that Kant had a predetermined view on this correspondence from the beginning.Because we believe that what determines this correspondence is the core issue of transcendental logic,which is how categories make the object of knowledge possible.The fact that Kant provides different correspondences in different texts may precisely indicate a gradual clarification of his ideas on this issue.In this article,on the one hand,based on the examination of these ideas,we reveal the reasons for the changes in Kant’s related texts;and on the other hand,we also point out that the chronology of Kantian texts is consistent with these changes.Therefore,it can be said that through this article,we have provided a genetic solution to the above-mentioned unsolved cases.

关 键 词：判断表 范畴表 对应关系 集合的统一性 三段式 

分 类 号：B516.31[哲学宗教—外国哲学]