检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:楚文娟 郭丽霞 程东旭 王红霞 崔廷 冯银龙 王建民 鲁平 CHU Wenjuan;GUO Lixia;CHENG Dongxu;WANG Hongxia;CUI Ting;FENG Yinlong;WANG Jianmin;LU Ping(Technology Center,China Tobacco Henan Industrial Co.,Ltd.,Zhengzhou 450000,China;College of Tobacco Science and Engineering,Zhengzhou University of Light Industry,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
机构地区:[1]河南中烟工业有限责任公司技术中心,河南郑州450000 [2]郑州轻工业大学烟草科学与工程学院,河南郑州450001
出 处:《轻工学报》2024年第6期93-100,共8页Journal of Light Industry
基 金:中国烟草总公司重大科技项目(110202101079(SJ-03));河南中烟工业有限责任公司重点科技项目(A202013)。
摘 要:为实现卷烟包灰性能的综合评价和评价结果具象化,以49个卷烟的灰色、裂口率、缩灰率、碳线宽度、碳线整齐度测定结果为原始变量,先运用K-means聚类、模糊判别法将原始变量转换为具象化的得分数据,再运用Critic赋权法赋予各项指标权重,建立了一种卷烟包灰性能综合评价方法。结果表明:将原始变量转换成区间为60~100、平均值在80左右的得分,可使评价结果具象化且更加符合认知习惯;5项指标的权重由高到低依次为裂口率(0.27)>缩灰率(0.25)>灰色(0.18)>碳线整齐度(0.16)>碳线宽度(0.14);卷烟包灰性能可划分为优、良、差三档,各档得分区间依次为(85,100]、[75,85]、[60,75);不同档次代表性卷烟的灰柱视觉效果对比结果证明,综合得分可客观反映卷烟包灰性能的优劣。In order to achieve a comprehensive evaluation of ash characterization of burning cigarette and make the evaluate results concrete,the gray scale,crack rate,shrinkage rate,width of char line,and uniformity of char line measurement results of 49 cigarettes were used as the primitive variables.Firstly,K-means clustering and fuzzy discriminant analysis were used to convert the primitive variables into concrete score data,then the weight of each indicator was assigned by critical weighting method,and a comprehensive evaluation method was established.The results indicated that converting the primitive variables into scores ranging from 60 to 100 with an average value of around 80 could make the evaluate results concrete and consistent with cognitive habits.The weight of the five indicators,from high to low,was as follows:crack rate(0.27)>shrinkage rate(0.25)>gray scale(0.18)>uniformity of char line(0.16)>width of char line(0.14).The comprehensive ash characterization of burning cigarette could be divided into three levels:excellent,good,and poor,the score range of each level was(85,100],[75,85],and[60,75),respectively,the comparison of bar charts of representative cigarettes of different levels proved that the comprehensive score could objectively reflect the advantages and disadvantages of the ash characterization of burning cigarette.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.128.99