检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王巧婷 严鑫 潘其达 WANG Qiaoting;YAN Xin;PAN Qida(Department of Stomatology,Xinfeng County People's Hospital,Xinfeng 341600,Jiangxi,China;Department of Stomatology,Xunwu County Hospital of traditional Chinese medicine,Xunwu 342200,Jiangxi,China)
机构地区:[1]信丰县人民医院口腔科,江西信丰341600 [2]寻乌县中医院口腔科,江西寻乌342200
出 处:《医学信息》2024年第22期114-117,共4页Journal of Medical Information
基 金:赣州市指导性科技计划项目(编号:GZ2023ZSF645)。
摘 要:目的研究超瓷树脂嵌体与美塑树脂嵌体修复治疗磨牙缺损的临床疗效。方法选取2022年1月-2023年10月我院收治的磨牙缺损患者68例为研究对象,共计100颗患牙,按照嵌体使用不同将患者分为超瓷树脂嵌体组(50颗)和美塑树脂嵌体组(50颗)。比较两组治疗效果、牙齿缺陷发生率、牙周健康指标(附着水平、牙周袋探诊深度、牙龈出血指数)及治疗满意度。结果超瓷树脂嵌体组治疗成功率(96.00%)与美塑树脂嵌体组(98.00%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);美塑树脂嵌体组牙齿缺陷发生率(4.00%)低于超瓷树脂嵌体组(12.00%)(P<0.05);两组治疗后附着水平、牙周袋探诊深度、牙龈出血指数均小于治疗前(P<0.05),但超瓷树脂嵌体组与美塑树脂嵌体组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);超瓷树脂嵌体组治疗满意度(98.00%)与美塑树脂嵌体组(100.00%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论超瓷树脂嵌体与美塑树脂嵌体修复治疗磨牙缺损均可实现较理想的效果,且均可在观察时限里表现出较好的美学、边缘密合性良好,患者治疗满意高。但美塑树脂嵌体修复治疗牙齿缺陷发生率相对较低,临床可根据实际需求合理选择修复材料。Objective To study the clinical effect of resin overlay and HRi inlay in the treatment of molar defect.Methods A total of 68 patients with molar defects admitted to our hospital from January 2022 to October 2023 were selected as the research objects,with 100 affected teeth.According to the different use of inlays,the patients were divided into resin overlay group(50 teeth)and HRi inlay group(50 teeth).The treatment effect,incidence of tooth defects,periodontal health indicators(attachment level,probing depth of periodontal pocket,gingival bleeding index)and treatment satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in the success rate of treatment between the resin overlay group(96.00%)and the HRi inlay group(98.00%)(P>0.05).The incidence of tooth defects in the HRi inlay group(4.00%)was lower than that in the resin overlay group(12.00%)(P<0.05).The attachment level,periodontal pocket depth and gingival bleeding index of the two groups after treatment were lower than those before treatment(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between the resin overlay group and the HRi inlay group(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in treatment satisfaction between the resin overlay group(98.00%)and the HRi inlay group(100.00%)(P>0.05).Conclusion Both resin overlay and HRi inlay group can achieve ideal results in the treatment of molar defects,and both can show good aesthetics and good marginal fit in the observation time limit,and the patients are satisfied with the treatment.However,the incidence of dental defects treated with resin overlay restoration is relatively low,and the repair materials can be reasonably selected according to the actual needs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.80.161