检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:齐树平 宋正锋 韩子从 宋耀武 佟伟 王富[5] QI Shuping;SONG Zhengfeng;HAN Zicong;SONG Yaowu;TONG Wei;WANG Fu(Hebei Transportation Investment Group Co.,Ltd.,Shijiazhuang 050000,China;China-Road Transportation Verification&Inspection Hi-Tech Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100088,China;China University of Petroleum,Beijing 102249,China;Zhangjiakou-Shijiazhuang Expressway Baoding Section Co.,Ltd.,Hebei Transportation Investment Group Co.,Ltd.,Baoding 071000,China;Wuhan Institute of Technology,Wuhan 430000,China)
机构地区:[1]河北交通投资集团有限公司,河北石家庄050000 [2]中路高科交通检测检验认证有限公司,北京100088 [3]中国石油大学,北京102249 [4]河北交通投资集团张石高速公路保定段有限公司,河北保定071000 [5]武汉工程大学,湖北武汉430000
出 处:《交通运输研究》2024年第5期112-118,128,共8页Transport Research
基 金:河北省交通运输厅2018年度科技项目(2018-16)。
摘 要:为了提升驾驶员在隧道中对车速的感知和控制能力,降低交通事故率,基于视错觉原理,针对隧道侧壁提出了9种不同形状、角度、长度、颜色组合的视觉控速引导标志设计方案,对驾驶员进行视觉刺激并提供视觉参考,达到主动降速的目的。在张石高速公路云蒙山一号隧道侧壁对这9种设计方案进行试验研究,利用视频和激光检测设备,检测9种设计方案下隧道内的车速,分析瞬时车速、平均车速、速度标准差和加速度数据,对比无控速标志下和采用设计控速标志下的控速效果及稳定性。结果表明:不同控速引导标志的降速效果不同,箭头形90°视觉控速引导标志的控速效果最显著,平均车速及车速标准差分别降低了18.3%和24.8%,并且在试验区间加速度变化稳定,在降低车速和提高车速稳定性方面均表现出较好的效果;对角线形55°视觉控速引导标志使车辆的瞬时速度提升了9.3%,增大了交通安全隐患。基于以上研究结果,推荐采用箭头形90°视觉控速引导标志作为隧道侧壁控速引导标志。In order to improve the drivers'ability to perceive and control the speed in tunnels and reduce the traffic accident rates,based on the principle of visual illusion,nine visual speed control guidance sign schemes with different shapes,angles,lengths,and color combinations were proposed for tunnel sidewalls to provide visual stimulation and reference for drivers,achieving the goal of active speed reduction.Experimental research was conducted on these nine design schemes on the sidewall of Yunmeng Mountain No.1 Tunnel on Zhangjiakou-Shijiazhuang Expressway.Video and laser detection equipment were used to detect the vehicle speed in the tunnel with the nine sign design schemes,analyze the instantaneous vehicle speed,average vehicle speed,speed standard deviation,and acceleration data,and compare the speed control effect and stability under the condition of no speed control sign and with the use of designed speed-control signs.The results showed that the deceleration effect of different speed control guidance signs was different.The arrow shaped 90°speed control visual guidance sign had the most significant deceleration effect,reducing the average vehicle speed and vehicle speed standard deviation by 18.3%and 24.8%,respectively.In addition,the acceleration change remained stable in the experimental range,showing good results in reducing vehicle speed and improving vehicle speed stability;The diagonal shaped 55°speed control visual guidance sign increased the instantaneous speed of the vehicle by 9.3%,increasing traffic safety hazards.Based on the above research results,it is recommended to use arrow shaped 90°speed control visual guidance signs as tunnel sidewall speed control guidance signs.
关 键 词:隧道安全 交通标志设计 速度控制 视错觉 视觉引导标志
分 类 号:U458.1[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程] U491.52[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.15.174.103