知识产权刑事司法保护:改革反思与发展展望  

Criminal Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property:Reflections on Reforms and Prospects of Development

作　　者：左卫民[1] 林健星 Zuo Weimin;Lin Jianxing

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,成都610207

出　　处：《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第6期144-156,214,共14页Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition

摘　　要：当下,旨在实现刑事司法专业化与程序衔接优化的知识产权刑事司法保护改革提高了知识产权司法保护水平。然而,刑事司法专业化改革存在集中管辖普适性不足,“三合一”审判中刑事保护水平较低,检察综合履职能力有待加强,技术事实查明机制构建不完善等问题。经程序衔接优化改革后,行刑衔接水平仍不理想,且刑事附带民事(公益)诉讼争议较大。有鉴于此,未来我国应通过正当化知识产权刑事集中管辖,深入推进知识产权审判“三合一”改革,探索建设国家知识产权法院和知识产权检察院,完善技术调查官制度,提高行刑衔接机制的监管水平,在刑民交叉案件中完善“先刑后民”审理方式并探索刑民一体型审理模式等一系列举措,打造更加专业化、高效衔接的刑事司法保护体系。Enhancing the level of criminal justice protection for intellectual property(IP)is conducive to developing the new quality productive forces.The level of criminal protection for IP can be primarily evaluated based on two core criteria:protection quality and protection intensity.The improvement of protection quality hinges on the continuous advancement of specialization reforms in criminal justice.And the enhancement of protection intensity is closely associated with optimizing the procedural links between administrative protection and criminal justice protection,as well as between civil and criminal justice protection.At present,the reforms of China's criminal justice protection of IP,which aim to achieve the judicial specialization and the optimization of procedural links,have improved the level of judicial protection of IP.However,the reforms of criminal justice specialization suffer from the lack of universality of centralized jurisdiction,inadequate criminal protection in IP integrated jurisdiction reform,insufficient capacity for prosecutorial comprehensive performance of duties,and poorly constructed technical fact finding mechanism.After reforms to optimize procedural links,the level of connection between administrative penalty and criminal of IP is unsatisfactory,and criminal incidental civil litigation and criminal incidental civil public interest litigation are still highly controversial in the field of IP.In response to the challenges,a more professional and efficiently connected criminal justice protection system should be created by justifying the centralized criminal jurisdiction of IP,further advancing the IP integrated jurisdiction reform,exploring the construction of a state-level IP High Court and IP Procuratorates,improving the technical investigator system,raising the level of supervision of the mechanism for the connection between administrative penalty and criminal of IP,perfecting the“criminal procedure prior to civil procedure”mode and exploring the criminal-civilian integrated trial m

关 键 词：知识产权 刑事保护 司法专业化 程序衔接 改革 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]