董仲舒与何休的学术渊源  

On the Academic Affinity Between Dong Zhongshu and He Xiu

作　　者：曾亦[1] ZENG Yi(Departmentof Philosophy,Tongji University,Shanghai200092,China)

机构地区：[1]同济大学哲学系,上海200092

出　　处：《衡水学院学报》2024年第6期6-10,19,共6页Journal of Hengshui University

摘　　要：董仲舒与何休之差异,素不为学者重视。然而到了晚清,龚自珍与魏源等开始强调董、何之间的差异,并着力发挥了董仲舒的思想,且对何休多有批评。然而依据史书关于胡毋生与董仲舒学术传承的记载,以及何休对两汉春秋学的批评,表明何休的学术实出于胡毋生,而非董仲舒。最后,结合对《春秋》中所载逄丑父一事的评论,凸显了何休与董仲舒在解经上的差异。The difference between Dong Zhongshu and He Xiu has never been a focus of scholarly attention.However,in the late Qing Dynasty,figures like GongZizhen and Wei Yanbegan to emphasize the differences between Dong and and He,making efforts to promoteDong’s ideas while criticizing He Xiu.However,according to historical records about the academic inheritance of Hu Wushengand Dong Zhongshu,as well as He Xiu’s critiquesof the Spring and Autumn Studiesof the Han Dynasty,He Xiu’s academic ideascome from Hu Wusheng,rather than Dong Zhongshu.Finally,by analyzing the commentaryon the incidentof PangChoufu recorded in the the Spring and Autumn Annals,the differences in interpreting the classics between He Xiu and Dong Zhongshu are highlighted.

关 键 词：董仲舒 何休 胡毋生 公羊学 

分 类 号：B234.5[哲学宗教—中国哲学]