检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴维[1] 林芷伊 魏明 WU Wei;LIN Zhiyi;WEI Ming(College of Air Traffic Management,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin,300300,China)
机构地区:[1]中国民航大学空中交通管理学院,天津300300
出 处:《高等理科教育》2024年第6期97-107,共11页Higher Education of Sciences
基 金:教育部第二批新工科研究与实践项目“交通运输专业新形态复合型教育教学资源体系构建与应用”(项目编号:E-HTJT20201712);中国民航大学一流专业建设项目(项目编号:CAUC-2021-A1-004)。
摘 要:为提升高等院校制定教学奖励科学性、精准性,文章使用系统论分析教学奖励与教学质量关系。基于教学奖励与教学质量交互逻辑关系,文章构建了以高校教学奖励投入与教师教学质量提升为对象的演化博弈模型。采用问卷数据和文献检索方法,文章量化了教学奖励与教学质量博弈效益矩阵,通过平衡点分析确定两者的协同机理。结果表明,高校教学奖励在效能上存在明显边际效应、激励不相容现象、明显“滞胀”区域,并有针对性地给出建议。In order to enhance the scientific and precision aspects of formulating teaching incentives in higher education institutions,a systemic analysis was conducted on the relationship between teaching incentives and teaching quality.Based on the interactive logic between teaching incentives and teaching quality,an evolutionary game model was constructed with the objective of focusing on the investment in teaching incentives in universities and the improvement of teachers'teaching quality.Using survey data and literature reviews,both factors'game benefit matrix was quantified.Through equilibrium point analysis,the collaborative mechanism between different teaching incentive strategies and teaching quality was determined.The study found that there are noticeable marginal effects,incentive incompatibility phenomena,and distinct"stagnation"regions in the effectiveness of teaching incentives in higher education.Combining these findings with the trends in game evolution,corresponding recommendations were provided.
分 类 号:G645[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90