检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶鹏 郭亮 YE Peng;GUO Liang(Southwest China Research Institute of Electronic Equipment,Chengdu Sichuan 610036,China)
出 处:《现代雷达》2024年第11期85-90,共6页Modern Radar
摘 要:为了提高舰载二维稳定平台船摇隔离效果与稳定精度,对比分析了速度前馈比例-积分(PI)控制器和线性自抗扰控制器的控制效果。首先,在二维稳定平台伺服系统数学模型的基础上,分别设计了基于船摇速度前馈的PI控制器和线性自抗扰控制器,并在仿真软件中建立了仿真模型;然后,以实际的船摇运动数据作为激励输入控制模型,分析了常规PI控制、速度前馈PI控制以及线性自抗扰控制的纵摇框架的稳定精度,仿真结果表明线性自抗扰控制稳定精度明显优于速度前馈PI控制;最后,通过海上试验验证了基于线性自抗扰控制的二维稳定平台具有较高的稳定精度,能够满足稳定平台伺服系统的工程化应用和性能指标要求。In order to improve the isolation effect and stability accuracy of shipborne two-dimensional stable platform,the control effects of speed feedforward proportional-integral(PI)controller and linear active disturbance rejection controller are compared.First,on the basis of the mathematical model of two-dimensional stable platform servo system,PI controller and linear active disturbance rejection controller based on ship rocking speed feedforward are designed,and simulation model is established in the simulation software.Then,using actual ship rocking motion data as the excitation input control model,the stability accuracy of the pitch frame of conventional PI control,speed feedforward PI control,and linear active disturbance rejection control is analyzed.Simulation results show that the stability accuracy of linear active disturbance rejection control is significantly better than that of speed feedforward PI control.Finally,it is verified through offshore experiments that the two-dimensional stable platform based on linear active disturbance rejection control has high stability accuracy and can meet the engineering application and performance requirements of the stable platform servo system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.210.133