比较法视域下我国认罪认罚案件证明标准的实践检视及再审视  

A Practical Review and Re-examination of the Standard of Proof in China’s Plea of Guilty Cases from the Perspective of Comparative Law

作　　者：林静 王瑞坤 Lin Jing;Wang Ruikun

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学证据科学教育部重点实验室,北京100088 [2]中国政法大学证据科学研究院,北京100088

出　　处：《湖湘法学评论》2024年第4期114-126,共13页Huxiang Law Revie

摘　　要：“排除合理怀疑”是在竞争性诉讼关系语境下发展出的风险分配的机制。“排除合理怀疑”之“合理”,实质上指向了事实认定者对事实形成确信的谨慎标准。在认罪认罚案件中,诉讼语境随被告人的认罪认罚发生变化,证明对象也从对要件事实的证明转为对要件事实与认罪认罚自愿性的审查。在以追求实质真实为底色的刑事诉讼理念下,我国认罪认罚案件的证明标准并未降低,仍然需达到“排除合理怀疑”的标准。但由于证明对象的转移及谨慎标准的语境依赖,认罪认罚案件的证明难度在事实上有所降低。“Beyond reasonable doubt”is a mechanism for risk allocation developed in competitive litigation relationships.The“reasonable”of“beyond reasonable doubt”points to the standard of care required of the fact finder to form a certainty about the facts.In cases with guilty plea,the litigation context changes as a result of the defendant’s guilty plea,and the object of proof shifts from the elemental facts to the elemental facts and the voluntariness of the plea.Under the criminal procedure philosophy of pursuing substantive truth,the standard of proof in cases with guilty plea is not lowered,and the standard of“beyond reasonable doubt”still needs to be met.However,due to the shift in the object of proof and the contextual reliance on the standard of care,the difficulty of proof in cases with guilty plea is reduced.

关 键 词：认罪认罚 证明标准 排除合理怀疑 合作性司法 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]