比较法视野下的必要共同诉讼问题  

Problems of the Necessary Joint Litigation from a Comparative Law Perspective

作　　者： 宋史超(译) Dimitrios Tsikrikas

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,江苏南京211189

出　　处：《湖湘法学评论》2024年第4期148-160,共13页Huxiang Law Revie

摘　　要：共同诉讼制度可以追溯到罗马法,并在欧洲各法系中广泛存在。在法国、德国和希腊,必要共同诉讼都没有立法定义。必要共同诉讼常常与多数人之债关联。必要共同诉讼根植于实体法,即使是所谓基于诉讼法原因的必要共同诉讼也不例外。必要共同诉讼的程序构造涉及当事人的地位、未出席者的代理、诉讼行为的效果,需要着重考虑共同诉讼人的实体处分权是共同的还是独立的。需要对必要共同诉讼人的上诉问题进行特别探讨,这包括仅部分必要共同诉讼人上诉与部分必要共同诉讼人放弃上诉如何处理、上诉期间的计算、未上诉的共同诉讼人如何参加二审程序等问题。The institution of joint litigation dates back to Roman law and is widespread in European legal systems.In France,Germany and Greece,there is no legislative definition of necessary joint litigation.Necessary joint litigations are often associated with obligations of multiple persons.Necessary joint litigations are rooted in substantive law,even in the case of so-called necessary joint litigations based on procedural causes.The procedural construction of a necessary joint litigation involves the status of the parties,the representation of non-attendees,and the effect of the litigation act,and requires a focus on whether the substantive dispositions of the joint litigants are joint or independent.The issue of appeals by necessary joint litigants needs to be explored in particular,including the treatment of appeals only by some of the necessary joint litigants and the abandonment of appeals by some of the necessary joint litigants,the calculation of the period of time for appeal,and the participation of non-appealing joint litigants in the proceedings of the second instance.

关 键 词：必要共同诉讼 当事人 诉讼行为 上诉 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]