检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张玲[1] 吴媛霞[2] 乔翠峰[1] 杜秀萍[1] ZHANG Ling;WU Yuanxia;QIAO Cuifeng;DU Xiuping(Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics,Shanxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Taiyuan 030012,China;Medical Reproductive Center,Shanxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital)
机构地区:[1]山西省妇幼保健院妇产科,太原030012 [2]山西省妇幼保健院医学生殖中心
出 处:《山西医科大学学报》2024年第9期1122-1126,共5页Journal of Shanxi Medical University
摘 要:目的 探计1型糖尿病(type 1 diabetes,T1DM)和卵巢癌(ovarian cancer,OC)之间的双向因果关系。方法 采用两样本孟德尔随机化(MR)设计,使用来自全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的T1DM遗传变异(9 266例欧洲血统病例和15 574例对照)和OC遗传变异(1 218例欧洲血统病例和198 523例对照)。采用MR-Egger、加权中位数(WME)、逆方差加权法(IVW)、简单模式(simple mode)和加权模式(weighted mode)来检验T1DM与OC之间的因果关系。然后采用留一法(leave-one-out)等敏感度分析来评估结果的可靠性。最后采用MR Steiger检验来测试暴露和结果之间的假设关系。结果 IVW法结果显示T1DM与OC的发病率增高有因果关系(OR=1.000 4,95%CI 1.000 1~1.000 8,P=9.01×10^(-3)),5种方法的估计值在方向上保持一致,表明T1DM是OC发病率的危险因素。MR Egger模型证实了结果无显著异质性(P>0.05),留一法敏感性分析去除单个SNP并重复进行MR分析时,结果较前无显著差异。Egger截距接近于零(截距<-0.001,P=0.191),表明本研究无水平多效性。同时反向MR分析并未发现OC促进T1DM发病风险增高的证据(OR=0.988,95%CI 3.09×10^(-5)~3.16×10^(4),P=0.998)。结论 遗传学证据表明,T1DM与OC的发病风险增加有关,相反,并未发现OC会使T1DM发病风险增高。Objective To assess the bidirectional causality between type 1 diabetes mellitus(T1DM)and ovarian cancer(OC).Methods Gene variants for T1DM(9266 European ancestry patients and 15574 controls)and OC(1218 European ancestry patients and 198523 controls)from genome-wide association studies(GWAS)were used in a two-sample Mendelian randomization(MR)design.MR-Egger,weighted median(WME),inverse variance weighting(IVW),simple mode and weighted mode were used to test the causal relationship between T1DM and OC.Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was used to assess the reliability of the results.Finally,MR Steiger test was used to test the hypothesized relationship between exposure and outcome.Results The results of IVW showed a causal relationship between T1DM and the incidence of OC(OR=1.0004,95%CI 1.0001-1.0008,P=9.01×10^(-3)),and the estimates of the above five methods were consistent in direction,indicating that T1DM was a risk factor for the incidence of OC.The MR Egger model confirmed that there was no significant heterogeneity in the results(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the results when a single SNP was removed from the sensitivity analysis and the repeated MR analysis was carried out.The Egger intercept was close to zero(intercept<-0.001,P=0.191),indicating that there was no horizontal pleiotropy in this study.Meanwhile,reverse MR analysis did not show any evidence that OC increased the risk of T1DM(OR=0.988,95%CI 3.09×10^(-5)-3.16×10^(4),P=0.998).Conclu-sion Genetic evidence shows that T1DM can be associated with the OC risk increase,while OC can not increase the risk of T1DM.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171