检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨雅妮[1] YANG Ya-ni(Lanzhou University Law School,Lanzhou 730000)
出 处:《行政法学研究》2024年第6期60-77,共18页Administrative Law Review
基 金:2021年度国家社科基金西部项目“检察机关办理公益诉讼案件民行刑衔接机制研究”(项目编号:21XFX015)。
摘 要:合理的诉讼成本分担机制既是民事公益诉讼制度的重要组成部分,又关涉到民事公益诉讼制度的运行效果,是公益诉讼立法应当关注的重要问题。现行规范虽然对民事公益诉讼的成本分担作了初步规范,但仔细审视,当前做法在起诉激励、违法行为惩戒与保障民事公益诉讼制度良性运行等方面仍存在不足。为此,应以“检察公益诉讼法(公益诉讼法)”的制定为契机,以民事公益诉讼成本分担机制的功能为理论依据,从案件受理费、证据调查及公告费用、律师费用的分担等方面入手,对我国民事公益诉讼成本分担机制进行全面优化。Reasonable litigation cost sharing mechanism is not only an important part of the civil public interest litigation system, but also related to the operation effect of the civil public interest litigation system, which is an important issue that should be paid attention to in public interest litigation legislation.Although the current norms have made preliminary regulations on the cost sharing of civil public interest litigation, but under careful examination, the current practice still has shortcomings in prosecution incentive, punishing illegal behavior and ensuring the benign operation of civil public interest litigation system.Therefore, we should take the formulation of the Procuratorial Public Interest Litigation Law(PPIL) as an opportunity, take the theory of the cost-sharing mechanism' function of public interest litigation as a theoretical basis, and start from the aspects of case acceptance fees, evidence investigation and announcement fees, and the sharing of lawyers' fees to comprehensively optimize the cost-sharing mechanism of civil public interest litigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.172