审美的“应当”:戈德洛维奇自然美学的伦理维度探析  

Aesthetic“Ought”:An Analysis on Ethical Dimension of Godlovich's Aesthetics of Nature

作　　者：李阳 LI Yang(Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学哲学系宗教学系,北京100871

出　　处：《美育学刊》2024年第6期82-89,共8页Journal of Aesthetic Education

摘　　要：在当代自然美学发展中,伦理与审美的关系被推至重要位置,伦理的正当性成为恰当欣赏自然的必然要求。戈德洛维奇的神秘主义欣赏立场在其中尤为独特,他认为,虽然当代自然美学突出了自然的他者地位,但欣赏自然的诸种观点依然是人/物中心主义的、单视角的。在他看来,对自然真正的欣赏应该是神秘主义的,他通过对神秘主义源流的梳理,进一步廓清了神秘主义与美学结合的历史背景。戈德洛维奇否定了积极美学所提供的道德价值,他认为对自然所负有的审美伦理不是保护的伦理而是超价值伦理。在实践立场上,不同于艺术审美,对自然的审美是绝对的“应当”,但其过于玄学的思考使得其理论的实践性不强。In the development of contemporary aesthetics of nature,the relationship between ethics and aesthetics has been pushed to an eye-catching position,and the legitimacy of ethics has become an inevitable requirement for the proper appreciation of nature.Godlovich s appreciation of mysticism is particularly special among them.He points out that although contemporary aesthetics of nature highlights the otherness of nature,various views of appreciation of nature are still man-object centrism and single perspective.Godlovitch further illustrates this point with the example of scientific cognitivism and affective reverential view which lie at the two poles of the approach of appreciation of nature.In his opinion,the true appreciation of nature should be mysticism.By combing the origin of mysticism,the historical background of the combination of mysticism and aesthetics are clarified.Godlovitch denies the ethics value provided by positive aesthetics,and thinks that the aesthetic ethics owed to nature is not the ethics of protection but the ethics of super-value.In terms of practical standpoint,unlike artistic appreciation,the appreciation of nature is an absolute“ought”,but its overly mystical thinking makes its theoretical practicality weak.

关 键 词：戈德洛维奇 自然美学 他者 神秘主义 伦理 审美 

分 类 号：B83-06[哲学宗教—美学]