非法集资犯罪案件中证据审查的认定困境及完善路径  

On the Difficulties and Improvement Path of Evidence Review in Illegal Fundraising Crime Cases

作　　者：赵润卓 ZHAO Runzhuo(Law School,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084

出　　处：《保定学院学报》2024年第6期63-69,91,共8页Journal of Baoding University

摘　　要：非法集资犯罪案件涉案金额大,案件持续时间较长,被害人数量较多,涉及非法吸收公众存款罪、集资诈骗罪等多个罪名。在司法实践中,由于认知偏差和证据查证不清,可能会导致行为“非法性”认定不清,行为人是否具有“非法占有目的”难以查证,涉案金额计算难等问题。因此,在非法集资犯罪案件的证据审查过程中,应当基于宽严相济的宏观政策导向,结合案件基本情形、行为人主观意图等因素,构建综合认定的审查思路,合理平衡刑罚轻重。同时,在实际工作中,司法机关应当建立健全非法集资犯罪案件的工作机制,合理完善审查路径,保障办案质量和办案效率同步发展。The crime of illegal fund-raising involves a large amount of money,a long duration of the case,a large number of victims,involving the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits,fund-raising fraud and other charges.In judicial practice,due to cognitive bias and unclear evidence verification,it may lead to unclear identification of the"illegality"of the behavior,difficult to verify whether the perpetrator has the"purpose of illegal possession",and difficult calculation of the amount involved.Therefore,in the process of evidence review of llegal fund-raising crime cases,we should build a comprehensive review idea based on the macro-policy orientation of combining the basic circumstances of the case,the subjective intention of the perpetrator and other factors,and reasonably balance the severity of punishment.At the same time,in actual work,judicial organs should establish and improve the working mechanism of illegal fund-raising crime cases,reasonably improve the review path,and ensure the simultaneous development of case quality and case handling efficiency.

关 键 词：非法集资 证据审查 非法性 非法占有目的 涉案金额 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学] D925.2[政治法律—法学]