检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王丹 叶春明[1] WANG Dan;YE Chunming(School of Management,Shanghai University of Technology,Shanghai 200093,China)
出 处:《物流科技》2024年第24期147-151,176,共6页Logistics Sci Tech
摘 要:在零售商公平关切和公平中性两种情形下,通过构建自贴生态标签策略下的绿色供应链决策模型,并结合数值仿真对两种决策模型的结果进行比较分析。研究表明,消费者对产品绿色标签的信任度对产品价格、绿色努力水平和供应链成员利润有正向的影响;同时,公平关切程度与产品的价格和绿色努力水平呈反比关系;考虑公平关切因素时,产品价格、绿色努力水平和制造商利润均低于公平中性情况,而零售商利润则高于公平中性情况;且随着公平关切程度的增加,零售商利润逐渐增加至平缓,而制造商利润逐渐减少至平缓。In the context of fair concern and fair neutrality in retailers,a decision-making model for green supply chain is constructed by constructing a self-adhesive eco-label strategy.A comparative analysis of the two decision-making models is conducted using numerical simulation.The research indicates that consumers'trust in the green label of products positively influences product prices,green effort level,and profits of supply chain members.Additionally,the fairness concern coefficient is inversely proportional to the price of green products and the level of green efforts.When considering fairness concerns,the retail price,the level of green efforts,and the manufacturer's profit are all lower than those in a fair-neutral scenario,while the retailer's profit is higher than that in a fair-neutral scenario.As the fairness concern coefficient increases,the retailer's profit gradually increases until it levels off,while the manufacturer's profit gradually decreases until it levels off.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15