检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜华 JIANG Hua(Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241000,China)
出 处:《建筑设计管理》2024年第10期53-59,共7页Architectural Design Management
摘 要:EPC工程总承包管理模式是目前我国积极提倡推广的一种工程承包模式,但其计价方式在我国仍处于探索发展中。政策文件建议工程总承包宜采用总价合同,实践中总价合同常用的计价模式主要有固定总价计价、预算定额费率计价、模拟工程量清单计价,文章详细阐述了三种计价方式的做法、优缺点、适用条件、适用范围等,并作出对比分析,以期为相关人员提供参考借鉴。The engineering procurement construction(EPC)management model is a project contracting model actively encouraged and promoted domestically,yet its pricing mechanism is still being explored and developed in China.Policy documents advocate that lump-sum contracts should be adopted in EPC projects.In practice,the commonly used pricing models of lump-sum contracts mainly include fixed lump-sum pricing,budget quota rate pricing,and simulated bill of quantities pricing.This paper described the methods,advantages and disadvantages,and applicable conditions and ranges of the three pricing models in detail,and conducted a comparative analysis,so as to provide reference for relevant personnel.
关 键 词:EPC工程总承包 总价合同 固定总价 费率 模拟清单
分 类 号:TU723.3[建筑科学—建筑技术科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.99.38