从瑞典新冠疫情的应对看权力与专业主义的分离  

The Separation of Power and Professionalism from the Response to the COVID-19 Epidemic in Sweden

作　　者：郭佳楠 GUO Jianan(Department of Development and Sustainability,Asian Institute of Technology,Khlong Luang 12120,Thailand)

机构地区：[1]亚洲理工学院发展与可持续性学院,泰国空滦12120

出　　处：《医学与哲学》2024年第23期16-18,27,共4页Medicine and Philosophy

基　　金：2021年国家社会科学基金高校思政课研究专项(21VSZ031)。

摘　　要：面对新冠疫情及其引发的多重危机,瑞典在疫情防控方面秉承的典型专家体制,其与瑞典宪法对专家群体与国家政治机构的分离有着密不可分的关系。首先探讨“专家暴政”基本思想、基础概念以及此次疫情应对中暴露的专家治理体制机制问题,通过梳理瑞典不同阶段应对新冠疫情的总体策略、防疫措施体系、经验,从政治体制视角揭示哈耶克知识问题如何促成政策过程中的“专家暴政”,总结避免这种专家体制在导致防疫权力结构冲突方面的经验启示,为我国重大传染病疫情防控与加强公共卫生管理建设提供参考借鉴。In the face of the COVID-19 and its multiple crises,Sweden's typical expert system in epidemic prevention and control and the Swedish Constitution have an inseparable relationship with its expert-driven system and the constitutional separation of expert groups and national political institutions.This paper first discusses the basic ideas and foundational concepts of"tyranny of expert",as well as the problems of expert governance system and mechanism exposed in the response to the epidemic.By combing Sweden's overall strategy,epidemic prevention measure system and experience in different stages of the COVID-19 epidemic,from the perspective of political system,this paper reveals how Hayek's knowledge problem contributes to the"tyranny of expert"in the policy-making process.The aim is to summarize the experience and enlightenment of avoiding conflicts within expert-led governance structures for epidemic control,and provides reference for the prevention and control of major infectious diseases and strengthening the construction of public health management in China.

关 键 词：新冠疫情 瑞典 专家暴政 

分 类 号：R-02[医药卫生]