“理论之后”还是“理论复兴”?--关于21世纪理论发展趋向的两种预演判断  

“After Theory”or“Theory Renaissance”:Two Rehearsal Judgments on the Trend of Theoretical Development in the 21st Century

作　　者：雷凯龙 李志雄[1] LEI Kailong;LI Zhixiong(School of Literature and Journalism,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 411100,China)

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学文学与新闻学院,湖南湘潭411100

出　　处：《广西科技师范学院学报》2024年第4期67-77,共11页Journal of Guangxi Science & Technology Normal University

基　　金：湖南省教育厅科学研究项目重点项目“布洛赫‘前仿真美学’研究”(21A0085)。

摘　　要：关于21世纪理论发展的基本趋向,特里·伊格尔顿与文森特·里奇给出了两种大相径庭的预演性判断。伊格尔顿基于马克思主义的宏大叙事立场,在对“正统文化理论”进行彻底“重思”的基础上,搭建出一条“理论之后”的“反后现代”道路;而里奇则以“后现代”景观的当下延展性为依托,在对“理论的后现代范式”进行回溯性“再探”的基础上,构想出一种“理论复兴”的“后现代”模式。通过对比两种判断的异质同构与同质异构之维,探寻其异质性生成的内在机理,并指明或可作为“调和”方案的“新审美主义”理论进路,有助于我们重新审视21世纪理论发展的基本态势。As for the basic trend of theoretical development in the 21st century,Terry Eagleton and Vincent Leitch give two very different rehearsal judgments.Rooted in the grand narrative stance of Marxism,and thoroughly“re-thinking”“orthodox cultural theory”,Eagleton set up an“anti-postmodern”road of“after theory”;On the basis of the current extension of the“postmodern”landscape,Leitch conceived a“postmodern”model of“theory renaissance”which was grounded in the retrospective“re-exploration”of the“postmodern paradigm of theory”.By comparing the heterogeneity of the two judgments,exploring the internal mechanism of their heterogeneity,and pointing out the theoretical approach of“new aestheticism”used as a“reconcile-ation”scheme,we can re-examine the basic trend of theoretical development in the 21st century.

关 键 词：理论之后 理论复兴 新审美主义 

分 类 号：I06[文学—文学理论]