帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪司法适用若干问题之厘清  

Clarifying Several Issues in the Judicial Application of the Crime of Assisting in Information Network Criminal Activities

作　　者：潘月德 Pan Yuede

机构地区：[1]辽宁省鞍山市铁西区人民法院

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2024年第4期9-15,共7页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：帮信罪虽存在性质之争,但不同观点均未否认其“帮助属性”,帮信罪打击的对象包括为他人利用信息网络实施掩隐罪提供帮助者。在犯罪认定层面,应当坚持罪刑法定原则,结合帮信罪的犯罪构成要件严格限定入罪标准。在区分关联犯罪层面,应当坚持主客观相统一的原则界分帮信罪与掩隐罪,具体可按照“四步走”的逻辑模型认定。在罪数形态层面,如果行为人在提供“两卡”之后又实施其他帮助行为或者“黑吃黑”行为的,应当以主观故意为标准界分一罪与数罪。Despite the debate over the nature of the crime of assisting in information network criminal activities (hereinafter referred to as the "assistance crime"),different viewpoints have not denied its "assistive attribute." The targets of punishment for this crime include those who provide assistance to others in committing the crime of concealing criminal proceeds through information networks.At the level of crime identification,the principle of legality should be adhered to,and the criteria for incrimination should be strictly defined in combination with the constituent elements of the assistance crime.When distinguishing related crimes,the principle of the unity of subjectivity and objectivity should be upheld to delineate the boundaries between the assistance crime and the crime of concealing criminal proceeds.Specifically,this can be done following a "four-step" logical model for identification.At the level of the number of crimes,if the perpetrator commits other acts of assistance or "double-crossing" behavior after providing "two cards" (referring to SIM cards and bank cards often used in illegal activities),the criterion for distinguishing between a single crime and multiple crimes should be based on subjective intent.

关 键 词：帮助属性 入罪与出罪 此罪与彼罪 一罪与数罪 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]