福柯与赫勒生命政治理论之比较研究  

A Comparative Study of Foucault’s and Herrer’s Theories of Biopolitics

作　　者：吴悦绮 Wu Yueqi(Heilongjiang University,Harbin 150080)

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学,哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《西部学刊》2024年第24期158-161,168,共5页Journal of Western

摘　　要：福柯和赫勒的生命政治理论存在较大差异。福柯主要关注生命权力的概念,包括生物政治与生物权力,以及生命政治与死亡的权力。赫勒则更关注对生命权力的理解、后马克思批判,以及抵抗与变革。福柯与赫勒生命政治理论比较:(一)在生命权力概念上,福柯侧重于国家对个体、人口的管理和控制,赫勒更多地关注个体如何体验和抵抗权力;(二)在治理逻辑上,福柯揭示了自由主义背后复杂的权力运作,而赫勒则从东欧经验出发,对自由主义提出了更为直接的批判;(三)在主体性和反抗路径上,他们都认识到个体能够在权力结构中找到反抗的空间,但赫勒更加注重个体在文化和日常生活中的自我实现。There are significant differences between Foucault’s and Heller’s theories of biopolitics.Foucault primarily focuses on the concept of life power,encompassing biopolitics and the power over life and death.Heller,on the other hand,is more concerned with the understanding of life power,post-Marxist critique,and resistance and transformation.A comparison of Foucault’s and Heller’s theories of biopolitics includes:(1)In terms of the concept of biopower,Foucault emphasizes the country’s management and control over individuals and populations,while Heller pays more attention to how individuals experience and resist power;(2)In terms of governance logic,Foucault reveals the complex operation of power behind liberalism,whereas Heller,drawing from Eastern European experiences,offers a more direct critique of liberalism;(3)In terms of subjectivity and paths of resistance,both recognize the space for individuals to resist within power structures,but Heller places greater emphasis on individuals’self-realization in culture and everyday life.

关 键 词：生命政治理论 差异 福柯 赫勒 

分 类 号：B51[哲学宗教—外国哲学] B56