仲裁裁决已确认事实的预决效力论  

On the Pre-determination effect of Confirmed facts in Arbitral Awards

作　　者：王振玮 WANG Zhenwei(School of Law,Shandong University,Qingdao Shandong 266237,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东青岛266237

出　　处：《乐山师范学院学报》2024年第10期86-94,共9页Journal of Leshan Normal University

摘　　要：仲裁裁决已确认事实在诉讼实践中存在着预决事实范围泛化、预决事实边界模糊化和预决事实法律效力混乱化的问题,盖源于我国既判力制度不彰、法律问题与事实问题界分不清以及仲裁裁决法律效力与预决效力区分不明。预决效力源于苏联法上判决的法律效力。苏联法的法律效力理论与德日法的既判力理论在我国形成合流,其制度的并存无可避免地存在相互龃龉的现象。文章于我国混合法系的语境下,为摆脱实践的窠臼,将法律效力制度与既判力、苏联与我国法律文书的结构要素两相比较,结果是:仲裁裁决主文的事实和法律判断以既判力的样貌发挥绝对预决效力,仲裁裁决事实认定部分的事实则以事实证明效的样态呈现相对预决效力。In litigation practice,facts,which have been confirmed by arbitral awards,have been generalized in the scope of prejudged facts,blurred the boundaries of prejudged facts,and confused the legal effect of prejudged facts,which stem from the lack of res judicata system in China,the unclear distinction between legal issues and factual issues,and the unclear distinction between legal and pre-determined effects of arbitral awards.The pre-determination effect derives from the legal effect of the judgment in Soviet law.The theory of legal effect of Soviet law and the res judicata theory of German-Japanese law have merged in our country,resulting in inevitable conflicts between their coexisting systems.In the context of our mixed legal system,in order to break free from the constraints of practice,the comparison between the effectiveness system of laws and the elements of res judicata,and that between the structure of legal documents in both Soviet Union and China are made.It is found that the facts and legal judgments of the main text of the arbitral award play an absolute prejudgment effect in the form of res judicata,while the facts of the fact-finding section of the arbitral award are relatively predetermined in the form of de facto effect.

关 键 词：仲裁裁决 预决效力 预决事实 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]