检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟利艳[1] 张怡清 MENG Liyan;ZHANG Yiqing(Research Center of Teenager Issues,Henan Normal University,Xinxiang 453007,China)
机构地区:[1]河南师范大学青少年问题研究中心,河南新乡453007
出 处:《人口与社会》2024年第6期68-80,共13页Population and Society
摘 要:基于中国社会状况综合调查2021年数据,选取18~45岁青年群体,采用二元Logistic回归研究主观社会地位、社会资源和幸福感的关系,并通过分组回归检验社会流动预期在其中的缓和作用。研究发现:总体来说主观社会地位下降会导致青年不幸福,社会流动预期对该影响具有缓和作用。分组分析显示:对社会资源较少的青年群体来说,主观社会地位下降会导致其不幸福,社会流动预期对该负向影响具有缓和作用;对社会资源较多的青年群体来说,主观社会地位下降对其幸福感没有影响,且社会流动预期的缓和作用也不显著。应重点关注农村、受教育程度低、低收入的青年,重点提升他们的向上流动预期水平,保证社会资源较少的青年群体也能共享社会改革发展的成果。Based on the 2021 data of the Comprehensive Survey of Social Conditions in China,young people aged 18-45 are selected to study the relationship between subjective social status,social resources and sense of happiness by using binary Logistic regression,and the moderating role of expected social mobility is tested by grouping regression.It is found that,in general,the decline of subjective social status will lead to young people s unhappiness,and expected social mobility will mitigate the effect.The grouping analysis shows that in young people with fewer social resources,a decline in subjective social status will lead to unhappiness,and expected social mobility will mitigate the negative impact;in young people with more social resources,a decline in subjective social status will have no impact on their happiness,and the moderating effect of expected social mobility is not significant.Therefore,special attention should be paid to young people in rural areas,with low education levels and low incomes,and relevant policies should be formulated to enhance their upward mobility expectations and ensure that young people with fewer social resources can also share the fruits of social reform and development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170