检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张伟[1] ZHANG Wei(School of Humanities,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200030,China)
出 处:《莆田学院学报》2024年第6期97-102,共6页Journal of putian University
摘 要:通过文本梳理,考证中华书局排印本《初学记》卷二十五后所附《严陆校宋本异文》的真伪性。所谓的《严陆校宋本异文》来自于严可均从王昶旧藏本中抄录的与明徐守铭本完全绝异的文字,这些文字又藏于我国台湾的郑氏宗文堂刻本《初学记》中;指出严氏所录已非郑本原貌,《严陆校宋本异文》实为后人伪造,严可均误认为真,这一认识深刻地影响了后来学者对《初学记》明清版本的认识,成为安国所得底本为残本说,乃至《初学记》有安国活字本说。The authenticity of The Variant of the Song Edition by Yan Kejun and Lu Xinyuan attached to the twenty-fifth volume of Chu Xue Ji printed by Zhonghua Book Company is verified through textual research.This so-called The Variant of the Song Edition by Yan Kejun and Lu Xinyuan comes from the completely different text that Yan Kejun copied from Wang Chang's old collection and Xu Shouming edition in Ming Dynasty.These words can still be found in version printed by Zongwentang of Zheng's family collected in Taiwan Province,China,but the version recorded by Yan is not the original appearance of Zongwentang's version.The Variant of the Song Edition by Yan Kejun and Lu Xinyuan was actually forged by later generations,but was mistakenly believed to be authentic by Yan Kejun.This understanding profoundly influenced later scholars'understanding of the versions of Chu Xue Ji printed in Ming and Qing Dynasty,and became the source of the theory that the original copy obtained by An Guo in Ming Dynasty was a damaged copy,and even that Chu Xue Ji has An Guo's movable type version.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.7.5