第三滞留的现象学起源及其技术哲学意义  

The Phenomenological Origin of Tertiary Retention and Its Significance for Philosophy of Technology

作　　者：孟强 MENG Qiang(School of Philosophy,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488,China;Institute of Philosophy,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100732,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学哲学院,北京102488 [2]中国社会科学院哲学研究所,北京100732

出　　处：《科学技术哲学研究》2024年第6期59-64,共6页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

基　　金：中国社会科学院学科建设登峰战略“科技伦理学”资助计划(DF2023XXJC02);中国社会科学院哲学研究所创新工程“前沿科技的哲学基础与科技时代的价值重置”(2024ZXSCX06)。

摘　　要：第三滞留(tertiary retention)是斯蒂格勒的核心概念,它为理解技术提供了独特视角。“滞留”源自胡塞尔内时间意识现象学,意指原印象以变异的形式持留于当下。在“几何学的起源”中,胡塞尔暂时远离了主体性原则,将目光转向了历史和传统。在此基础上,斯蒂格勒提出“第三滞留”,即外化的、客观的、物化的记忆。与胡塞尔不同,斯蒂格勒主张第三滞留是构成性的。将技术视为第三滞留意味着技术不仅仅是工具,技术构成此在(Dasein)。Tertiary retention is the core concept coined by Bernard Stiegler,offering a unique perspective for under⁃standing technology.“Retention”originates from Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology of the consciousness of inter⁃nal time,meaning that urimpression is retained in the present moment in the form of variation.In The Origin of Ge⁃ometry,Husserl temporarily moved away from the principle of subjectivity and turned his attention to history and tradition.Based on that,Stiegler proposed“tertiary retention”,which refers to the externalized,objective,and materialized memory.Contrary to Husserl,Stiegler insisted that the tertiary retention is constitutive.Considering technology as tertiary retention implies that technology is not just a tool,but it constitutes Dasein.

关 键 词：第三滞留 现象学 技术哲学 斯蒂格勒 胡塞尔 

分 类 号：B506[哲学宗教—外国哲学]