检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:江虹 朱跃平[1] 寿建维 曹宇[1] 李亚玲[2] 王菲 丁福[2] Jiang Hong;Zhu Yueping;Shou Jianwei;Cao Yu;Li Yaling;Wang Fei;Ding Fu(Department of Gerontology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400016,China;Department of Nursing,The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400016,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆医科大学附属第一医院老年病科,重庆400016 [2]重庆医科大学附属第一医院护理部,重庆400016
出 处:《中华医学教育探索杂志》2024年第11期1561-1566,共6页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
基 金:重庆医科大学智慧医学项目(ZHYX2019003);重庆市临床护理重点专科建设项目(委办(2023-52))。
摘 要:目的在老年专科护士失禁相关性皮炎(incontinence associated dermatitis,IAD)培训中评价工作坊模式的培训效果,旨在为专科护理领域培训中工作坊教学模式的应用提供参考和依据。方法采用便利抽样法,选取2021年5月参加第九届重庆市老年专科护士培训班的40名学员作为干预组,采用工作坊模式开展IAD教学;同时,将2020年5月参加第八届重庆市老年专科护士培训班的42名学员设为对照组,对其实施IAD的传统理论讲授法培训。培训结束后,采用问卷调查的方式来比较两组学员的教学目标达成情况及教学满意度;并通过量表测评来比较两组学员在IAD护理知识和态度水平上的差异。数据分析采用SPSS 27.0软件进行t检验和卡方检验。结果问卷调查显示,干预组在各维度的教学目标达成情况均高于对照组(P<0.05)。在授课形式、学习兴趣度、动手能力、理论掌握度、理论结合实践能力、分析解决问题能力6个方面的教学满意度,干预组各维度的评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。进一步比较两组的IAD护理知识和态度得分,干预组的IAD护理知识得分(11.32±1.56)和态度得分(37.63±3.54)均高于对照组的IAD护理知识得分(9.02±2.26)和态度得分(32.81±2.97)(P<0.05)。结论工作坊培训得到学员较高的认可度,有助于提升教学的实施效果,增强学员对IAD护理知识及态度的掌握水平,为专科护理领域实践性较强的培训提供新的思路。ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of workshop-based incontinence associated dermatitis(IAD)training course for geriatric nurse specialists,and to provide references and evidence for the application of workshop teaching model in specialized nursing training.MethodsThe convenience sampling method was used to select 40 participants in the 9th Chongqing Geriatric Nurse Specialist Training Program in May 2021 as the intervention group,and IAD training was conducted using the workshop method.The 42 participants in the 8th Chongqing Geriatric Nurse Specialist Training Program in May 2020 were selected as the control group,who received IAD training through traditional teaching methods.After the training,the achievement of teaching objectives and teaching satisfaction were compared between the two groups using questionnaire survey,and IAD nursing knowledge and attitudes were compared using scales.SPSS 27.0 was used for the t-test and chi-square test.ResultsThe questionnaire survey showed that the intervention group achieved higher teaching objectives in all dimensions compared to the control group(P<0.05).Compared with the control group,the intervention group had higher scores in teaching satisfaction regarding teaching format,interest in learning,practical skills,theoretical understanding,integration of theory and practice,and problem-solving abilities(P<0.05).Compared with the control group,the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher scores in IAD nursing knowledge[(11.32±1.56)vs.(9.02±2.26),P<0.05]and attitudes[(37.63±3.54)vs.(32.81±2.97),P<0.05].ConclusionsThe workshop training has been highly recognized by the trainees,contributing to improved implementation effectiveness of teaching,enhancing the scores of IAD nursing knowledge and attitudes.This approach offers a new perspective for training with a practical focus in the specialized nursing field.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.140.5