从成因类型检视轻罪重判的刑事赔偿进路  

Examining the Criminal Compensation Path of Severe Punishment for Misdemeanors from the Perspective of Cause Types

作　　者：张江丽 ZHANG Jiang-li(Xinjiang Judicial Bureau,Yuncheng,Shanxi 043100)

机构地区：[1]新绛县司法局,山西运城043100

出　　处：《司法警官职业教育研究》2024年第3期47-56,共10页Vocational Education Research of Judicial Police

基　　金：2022年度太原科技大学校级研究生创新项目课题“刑事赔偿范围合理扩张之实证研究——以近五年人身自由权刑事赔偿案例为样本”(SY2022029)。

摘　　要：当前,刑事赔偿立法仅将部分因事实认定错误导致的轻罪重判予以差异化赔偿,违背了国家尊重和保障人权的刑事法治精神,偏离了罪责刑相对均衡的应然状态。轻罪重判作为刑事司法运作固有风险,应以具体刑罚适用为标准重新检视“无罪”的实质内涵,破除以刑事无罪判决为先决条件的制度困境,让轻罪重判被超期羁押之人就人身自由权获得同等实体赔偿权,同时,以具有从属性地位的精神损害救济体现不同成因类型下轻罪重判的差异更为适当。Currently,criminal compensation legislation only provides differentiated compensation for minor offenses resulting from erroneous factual determinations,which violates the spirit of criminal rule of law that respects and safeguards human rights,and deviates from the expected state of relative balance between criminal responsibility and punishment.As an inherent risk in the operation of criminal justice,severe punishment for misdemeanors should be re-examined based on the specific application of criminal penalties,and the institutional dilemma of using criminal innocence as a prerequisite should be eliminated.Empower individuals who have been detained for extended periods with severe punishment for misdemeanors to receive equal substantive compensation for their right to personal freedom.At the same time,it is more appropriate to reflect the differences in severe punishment f extended or misdemeanors under different types of causes through spiritual damage relief with subordinate status.

关 键 词：刑事赔偿 轻罪重判 超期羁押 无罪羁押赔偿原则 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]