殊途同归——汉德尔关于《孙子兵法》与《战争论》的战略思想比较研究  

Different Paths Lead to the Same Destination:A Comparative Study of Handel’s Strategic Thinking on The Art of War and On War

作　　者：刘四龙[1] Liu Silong

机构地区：[1]军事科学院北京香山论坛秘书处

出　　处：《孙子研究》2024年第5期74-81,共8页Sunzi Studies

摘　　要：与一般认为《孙子兵法》与《战争论》存在根本差异的观点不同,迈克尔·汉德尔《战争大师:经典战略思想》采取文本比较的方法,对两部经典著作进行了详细的比较分析,指出两者核心观点基本一致,造成区别的根本原因是孙子与克劳塞维茨研究战争的层次不同。结合对约米尼、马基雅维利、科贝特等人军事思想的分析,汉德尔指出战争中存在着永恒的制胜逻辑。Unlike the general view that there are fundamental differences between The Art of War and On War,Michael Handel’s Masters of War:Classic Strategic Thought adopts a text comparison method to conduct a detailed comparative analysis of the two classic works,pointing out that the core ideas of the two are basically the same,and the fundamental reason for the difference is that Sun Zi and Clausewitz have different levels of research on war.Combined with the analysis of the military thoughts of Jomini,Machiavelli,Corbett and Mao Zedong,Handel pointed out that there is an eternal logic of winning in war.

关 键 词：汉德尔 《孙子兵法》 《战争论》 比较 

分 类 号：B22[哲学宗教—中国哲学]