深渊与爱:埃克哈特、吕斯布鲁克的“合一性”与“之间性”之争  

Abyss and Love--The Dispute Between Eckhart and Ruusbroec on"Union"and"Betweenness"

作　　者：雷思温 Lei Siwen(School of Philosophy,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100871,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院,北京100871

出　　处：《复旦学报（社会科学版）》2024年第6期46-56,共11页Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

基　　金：中国人民大学2023年度“中央高校建设世界一流大学(学科)和特色发展引导专项资金”支持。

摘　　要：人与超越性的维度之间究竟有怎样的关联,是哲学和神学发展中重要的思想议题。作为中世纪基督教神秘主义的重要思想代表,埃克哈特与吕斯布鲁克在利用新柏拉图主义思想矫正亚里士多德主义哲学对基督教信仰生活的冲击时,既共同强调了上帝的离基深渊性(Abgrund),同时也产生了深刻的立场差异。埃克哈特偏重于舍离自我、忘记上帝的深渊合一体验,而吕斯布鲁克则为这种合一关系注入了爱与德行的“之间性”伦理维度与教化层次。这一分歧不但可以延伸到海德格尔与列维纳斯等人的现代思想争执,同时也可以为思考不同哲学传统的差异性提供参照。理解两者的思想分歧,关系到人类在思考终极的哲学问题时,是否应将伦理教化和德行养成作为根源和基础。在“合一性”中是否应该建立伦理的“之间性”,在深渊中是否有爱,也因此成为具有普遍性的思想问题。The relationship between human being and the transcendental dimension is an important theme in Western philosophy and theology.As important representatives of medieval Christian mysticism,when using Neoplatonism thought to correct the influence of Aristotelian philosophy on Christian faith,Eckhart and Ruusbroec emphasized the abyssal(abground)nature of God,yet differed in the approaches towards God.Eckhart focuses on the abyssal union experience of abandoning oneself and forgetting God,while Rusbroec adds the ethical dimension of"betweenness"of love and virtue into this union.This disagreement can not only extend to the controversy between Heidegger and Levinas,but also provide an illuminating background for understanding the differences among diverse philosophical traditions.Revealing the differences between Eckhart and Ruusbroec is related to whether we should take ethical dimension and moral cultivation as the origin and foundation when we mediate on metaphysical puzzles.Whether we should establish the ethical"betweenness"in""union"and whether there is love in the abyss have therefore become a universal philosophical question.

关 键 词：神秘主义 离基深渊 合一性 之间性 爱 中介 

分 类 号：B5[哲学宗教—外国哲学] B82-0