检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:师佳佳 张艺凡 陈云锦 郝辉 俞富龙 高剑波[1] 万娅敏[1] SHI Jiajia;ZHANG Yifan;CHEN Yunjin;HAO Hui;YU Fulong;GAO Jianbo;WAN Yamin(Department of Radiology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450052,China;Department of Radiology,Zhengzhou Central Hospital,Zhengzhou 450007,China;Department of Radiology,Heze Municipal Hospital,Heze 274000,China)
机构地区:[1]郑州大学第一附属医院放射科,河南郑州450052 [2]郑州市中心医院放射科,河南郑州450007 [3]菏泽市立医院放射科,山东菏泽274000
出 处:《中国医学影像技术》2024年第11期1720-1724,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
摘 要:目的 观察多参数光谱CT鉴别G2~3级胰腺神经内分泌瘤(pNET)与胰腺神经内分泌癌(pNEC)的价值。方法 回顾性分析35例pNET(pNET组,含G2级25例、G3级10例)及17例pNEC(pNEC组)术前双层探测器光谱CT(DLCT),分别将单因素分析显示组间差异有统计学意义的常规CT及光谱CT参数纳入多因素logistic回归,筛选鉴别G2~3级pNET与pNEC的独立预测因子,构建常规CT模型及光谱CT模型,并基于二者构建联合模型;评估各模型鉴别G2~3级pNET与pNEC的效能。结果 常规CT病灶静脉期CT值(OR=0.939,P=0.025)及血管侵犯(OR=5.049,P=0.027)均为独立预测因子,以之构建的常规CT模型鉴别G2~3级pNET与pNEC的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.808。光谱CT所示静脉期标准碘密度(OR=0.603)及静脉期标准有效原子序数(OR=0.847)均为独立预测因子(P均<0.05),以之构建的光谱CT模型的AUC为0.894,高于常规CT模型(Z=2.127,P=0.033)。联合模型的AUC为0.924,高于常规CT模型(Z=2.302,P=0.021)而与光谱CT模型差异无统计学意义(Z=0.827,P=0.408)。结论 多参数光谱CT能有效鉴别G2~3级pNET与pNEC。Objective To explore the value of multi-parameter spectral CT for differentiating grade G2-3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor(pNET)and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma(pNEC).Methods Preoperative double-layer detector spectral CT(DLCT)data of 35 patients with pNET(pNET group,including 25 cases of G2 grade and 10 cases of G3 grade)and 17 patients with pNEC(pNEC group)were retrospectively analyzed.Conventional CT and spectral CT parameters were compared between groups,and those being significant different between groups according to univariate analysis were respectively incorporated into multivariate logistic regression to select the independent predictors for identifying grade G2-3 pNET and pNEC.Conventional CT model and spectral CT model were constructed,and the combined model was constructed based on the two.The efficacy of each model for distinguishing grade G2-3 pNET and pNEC was evaluated.Results CT values of lesions during venous phase(OR=0.939,P=0.025)and vascular invasion(OR=5.049,P=0.027)shown on conventional CT were both independent predictors,and conventional CT model was constructed,its area under the curve(AUC)for distinguishing grade G2-3 pNET and pNEC was 0.808.Normalized iodine concentration during venous phase(OR=0.603)and normalized effective atomic number during venous phase(OR=0.847)on spectral CT were both independent predictors(both P<0.05),and spectral CT model was constructed.The AUC of spectral CT model was 0.894,higher than that of conventional CT model(Z=2.127,P=0.033).The AUC of combined model was 0.924,higher than that of conventional CT model(Z=2.302,P=0.021)but not significantly different with that of spectral CT model(Z=0.827,P=0.408).Conclusion Multi-parameter spectral CT could effectively differentiate grade G2—G3 grade pNET and pNEC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185