检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘培勤[1] 张敬阳[1] 刘志诚[2] 杨勇[1] 罗浩[1]
机构地区:[1]东风汽车公司总医院口腔科,湖北十堰442000 [2]武警新疆总队医院口腔科
出 处:《临床口腔医学杂志》2002年第6期455-456,共2页Journal of Clinical Stomatology
摘 要:目的通过病例复查 ,找出前牙桩冠修复工作中的问题及不足 ,使前牙桩冠修复技术更加完善。方法 收集临床病例进行有关项目复查。结果 成品桩钉和铸造桩核固位效果无差异 ,烤瓷冠满意度 10 0 %。塑料冠外观差 ,对龈组织刺激性大 ,远期效果不理想。结论 桩核的类型不影响桩冠的固位 。Objective To find out the defects and problems in the work of anterior teeth restored through the reexamination of the cases,and to make the technology more perfectful. Methods To reexaminate the related aspects of the cases which were collected and informed.Results The retention effects of the prefabricated screw post and the cast post have no difference.The satisfaction index to the PFM was 100%.The appearances of the resin crowns was poor .The resin crows had the bad stimulatitions to the gingival tissues,and the long-term effect of them were not preferable.Conclusions The types of post and core have no effect to the retention of the post cown.PFM crown is a preferable prosthese material to the anterior tooth.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147