刑事诉讼数字证据的概念、特征与审查  

Digital Evidence in Criminal Proceedings:Concept,Characteristics,and Review

作　　者：陈在上 任逸飞 CHEN Zaishang;REN Yifei(School of Criminal Justice,Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou 450046,China;School of Law,Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou 450046,China)

机构地区：[1]河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,河南郑州450046

出　　处：《山东科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第6期26-34,共9页Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：河南省哲学社会科学规划办年度项目(2021BFX004)。

摘　　要：当前刑事诉讼中的电子数据概念已无法适应数字技术发展,须将其升级为数字证据概念。数字证据是以电子数据为基础、融合区块链与算法等数字技术的新证据种类,能够回应数字时代技术挑战、顺应证据法律体系发展并发挥分类审查制度优势,具有技术复杂性、内容精确性、外延广泛性与数据脆弱性等特征。不同类型的数字证据应遵循不同的司法审查规则,故应构建一种以规则应用为基础、以数据鉴真为重点、以算法为核心的三阶式分类司法审查规则,以实现数字证据的有效审查。The notion of electronic data in contemporary criminal proceedings has become outdated in the context of advancing digital technology and necessitates an upgrade to the concept of digital evidence.Digital evidence represents a novel form of evidence,rooted in electronic data,and integrates digital technologies such as blockchain and algorithms.This form of evidence is capable of addressing the technological challenges posed by the digital era,aligning with the evolution of the evidence legal framework,and harnessing the strengths of the classification review system.It is characterized by technical sophistication,precision in content,extensive applicability,and vulnerability in data integrity.Given the diversity of digital evidence,it is imperative to adopt distinct judicial review standards for each type.Therefore,a three-tiered classification judicial review framework,grounded in existing rules,with a focus on data authenticity,and leveraging algorithm as its cornerstone,should be established to ensure effective scrutiny of digital evidence.

关 键 词：数字证据 法定证据种类 审查规则 电子数据 算法 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]