检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙道萃 SUN Daocui(College of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing,100088,China)
出 处:《北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2025年第1期75-83,共9页Journal of Beijing Union University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:最高人民法院关于2024年度司法研究重大课题“‘网络水军’违法犯罪类型及法律适用问题研究”(项目编号:GFZDKT2024C01-1);中国政法大学“青年拔尖人才”(项目编号:2023—2025);中国政法大学2024年科研创新年度规划项目“数字经济刑法研究”(项目编号:24KYGH007)。
摘 要:传统刑法规范供给不足使网络犯罪时代的刑法解释困题不断。这制约刑法自发有效应对新型网络犯罪的效能。当前,在网络犯罪的刑法解释之必要性与功能定位失准、扩张解释的不当泛化迹象、刑法解释的限度模糊、刑法解释的方法论匮乏等基本实践支点上仍困扰不断。应充分认清并理性看待网络时代刑法解释的必然性及其制度瓶颈,合理接纳刑法解释的逻辑立场变异动向,准确界定扩张解释的功能导向,重塑特定理论。应澄清解释规范的定位,以及其与创制规范的功能差序;可通过刑法解释扩充网络犯罪规范的基础容量,注重刑法解释规则升级并提炼指导案例的适法规则。应当关注刑法解释限度的逻辑切换,妥善处理扩张解释与类推解释的区分弱化、技术逻辑与刑法解释立场的高度协同等基本问题。The criminal law interpretation of cybercrime is a promising proposition related to the basic strategy of the contemporary criminal law system to deal with cybercrime spontaneously and effectively.However,there are problems in the basic practical pivots,such as the misplaced necessity and function of the criminal law interpretation of cybercrime,the signs of inappropriate generalization of the expansion of the interpretation,the ambiguity of the limits of the criminal law interpretation,and the lack of the methodology of the criminal law interpretation.It is necessary to fully recognize and rationally view the inevitability and institutional bottlenecks of criminal law interpretation in the cyber era,reasonably accept the variation trends of logical positions in criminal law interpretation,define the functional orientation of criminal law interpretation,and pay attention to the rule escalation and legal guidance of criminal law interpretation.In the optimization of criminal law interpretation for cybercrime,it is necessary to enrich the realization path of criminal law interpretation,advocate the openness and pluralism of the criminal law interpretation path,and issue more guiding cases.Attention should be paid to the logical shift of the limits of criminal law interpretation and proper handling of fundamental issues,such as the distinction between expansive and analogical interpretation and the high degree of coordination between technical logic and criminal law interpretation positions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.91